mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

IPMix: Label-Preserving Data Augmentation Method for Training Robust Classifiers

arXiv 2310.04780 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2023cs.CVcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data augmentation has been proven effective for training high-accuracy convolutional neural network classifiers by preventing overfitting. However, building deep neural networks in real-world scenarios requires not only high accuracy on clean data but also robustness when data distributions shift. While prior methods have proposed that there is a trade-off between accuracy and robustness, we propose IPMix, a simple data augmentation approach to improve robustness without hurting clean accuracy. IPMix integrates three levels of data augmentation (image-level, patch-level, and pixel-level) into a coherent and label-preserving technique to increase the diversity of training data with limited computational overhead. To further improve the robustness, IPMix introduces structural complexity at different levels to generate more diverse images and adopts the random mixing method for multi-scale information fusion. Experiments demonstrate that IPMix outperforms state-of-the-art corruption robustness on CIFAR-C and ImageNet-C. In addition, we show that IPMix also significantly improves the other safety measures, including robustness to adversarial perturbations, calibration, prediction consistency, and anomaly detection, achieving state-of-the-art or comparable results on several benchmarks, including ImageNet-R, ImageNet-A, and ImageNet-O.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 76 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2023.

Builds on

76 of 98 references.

References · 76

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  7. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  8. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  9. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  10. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  11. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  12. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
38 more
  1. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  2. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  3. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  4. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  5. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  6. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  7. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
  8. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  9. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  10. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  11. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  12. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  13. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  14. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,173
  15. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  16. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
  17. 2018CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 968
  18. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
  19. 2021Open-vocabulary Object Detection via Vision and Language Knowledge Distillationcited by 903
  20. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  21. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  22. 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 772
  23. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  24. 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 572
  25. 2023Language Is Not All You Need: Aligning Perception with Language Modelscited by 543
  26. 2021CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 529
  27. 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 417
  28. 2019PIXOR: Real-time 3D Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 358
  29. 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 312
  30. 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 291
  31. 2019Adversarial Examples Improve Image Recognitioncited by 283
  32. 2020Puzzle Mix: Exploiting Saliency and Local Statistics for Optimal Mixupcited by 260
  33. 2021Voxel Transformer for 3D Object Detectioncited by 247
  34. 2019Fast AutoAugmentcited by 243
  35. 2017NormFace: L2 Hypersphere Embedding for Face Verificationcited by 237
  36. 2018Generalisation in humans and deep neural networkscited by 237
  37. 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
  38. 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 225

50 most cited of 76 All 76 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: