mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SPADE: Sparsity-Guided Debugging for Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2310.04519 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2023cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is known that sparsity can improve interpretability for deep neural networks. However, existing methods in the area either require networks that are pre-trained with sparsity constraints, or impose sparsity after the fact, altering the network's general behavior. In this paper, we demonstrate, for the first time, that sparsity can instead be incorporated into the interpretation process itself, as a sample-specific preprocessing step. Unlike previous work, this approach, which we call SPADE, does not place constraints on the trained model and does not affect its behavior during inference on the sample. Given a trained model and a target sample, SPADE uses sample-targeted pruning to provide a "trace" of the network's execution on the sample, reducing the network to the most important connections prior to computing an interpretation. We demonstrate that preprocessing with SPADE significantly increases the accuracy of image saliency maps across several interpretability methods. Additionally, SPADE improves the usefulness of neuron visualizations, aiding humans in reasoning about network behavior. Our code is available at https://github.com/IST-DASLab/SPADE.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2023.

Builds on

58 of 76 references.

References · 58

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  6. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
  7. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  8. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  9. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  10. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
  11. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  12. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
38 more
  1. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  2. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  3. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  4. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  5. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  6. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
  7. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,090
  8. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  9. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  10. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
  11. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  12. 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 800
  13. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
  14. 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 579
  15. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
  16. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
  17. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
  18. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
  19. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
  20. 2015Understanding Neural Networks Through Deep Visualizationcited by 332
  21. 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 328
  22. 2022Optimal Brain Compression: A Framework for Accurate Post-Training Quantization and Pruningcited by 317
  23. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
  24. 2016Multifaceted Feature Visualization: Uncovering the Different Types of Features Learned By Each Neuron in Deep Neural Networkscited by 106
  25. 2021Accelerated Sparse Neural Training: A Provable and Efficient Method to Find N:M Transposable Maskscited by 103
  26. 2017Measuring the tendency of CNNs to Learn Surface Statistical Regularitiescited by 87
  27. 2021Leveraging Sparse Linear Layers for Debuggable Deep Networkscited by 82
  28. 2022Impossibility Theorems for Feature Attributioncited by 78
  29. 2022What do Vision Transformers Learn? A Visual Explorationcited by 75
  30. 2022Polysemanticity and Capacity in Neural Networkscited by 74
  31. 2023X-Pruner: eXplainable Pruning for Vision Transformerscited by 66
  32. 2021Low-Complexity Probing via Finding Subnetworkscited by 63
  33. 2020There and Back Again: Revisiting Backpropagation Saliency Methodscited by 60
  34. 2021AC/DC: Alternating Compressed/DeCompressed Training of Deep Neural Networkscited by 58
  35. 2018Not Using the Car to See the Sidewalk: Quantifying and Controlling the Effects of Context in Classification and Segmentationcited by 49
  36. 2019Relative Attributing Propagation: Interpreting the Comparative Contributions of Individual Units in Deep Neural Networkscited by 49
  37. 2021Robust Explainability: A Tutorial on Gradient-Based Attribution Methods for Deep Neural Networkscited by 48
  38. 2022Metrics for saliency map evaluation of deep learning explanation methodscited by 40

50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.