Analysis of the Reasoning with Redundant Information Provided Ability of Large Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a range of natural language processing tasks, especially in reasoning, a cornerstone for achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). However, commonly used benchmarks may not fully encapsulate the inferential abilities of these models in real-world scenarios. To address this gap, a new form of Question-Answering (QA) task, termed Reasoning with Redundant Information Provided (RRIP), is introduced. The study designed a modified version of the grade school math 8K (GSM-8K) dataset which has several variants focusing on different attributes of redundant information. This investigation evaluates two popular LLMs, LlaMA2-13B-chat and generative pre-trained transformer 3.5 (GPT-3.5), contrasting their performance on traditional QA tasks against the RRIP tasks. Findings indicate that while these models achieved moderate success on standard QA benchmarks, their performance notably declines when assessed on RRIP tasks. The study not only highlights the limitations of current LLMs in handling redundant information but also suggests that future training of these models should focus on incorporating redundant information into the training data to increase the performance on RRIP tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 9 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2023.
Builds on
9 of 9 references.
References · 9
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2020Deep Learning Based Text Classification: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 140
- 2019A BERT Baseline for the Natural Questionscited by 33
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.
- 2024Can Large Language Models Detect Rumors on Social Media?cited by 9
- 2025A Survey of LLM × DATAcited by 4
- 2025A Survey of LLM × DATA24 May 2025
- 2024Can Large Language Models Detect Rumors on Social Media?6 Feb 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Over-Reasoning and Redundant Calculation of Large Language Models
- 2025Evaluating the Meta- and Object-Level Reasoning of Large Language Models for Question Answering
- 2024From Data to Commonsense Reasoning: The Use of Large Language Models for Explainable AI
- 2025Is Large Language Model Performance on Reasoning Tasks Impacted by Different Ways Questions Are Asked?
- 2026Exploring the Meta-level Reasoning of Large Language Models via a Tool-based Multi-hop Tabular Question Answering Task
- 2023Getting MoRE out of Mixture of Language Model Reasoning Experts
- 2024Refining Answer Distributions for Improved Large Language Model Reasoning
- 2024Evaluating Consistency and Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models