Evaluating the Meta- and Object-Level Reasoning of Large Language Models for Question Answering
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in natural language tasks but still face challenges in Question Answering (QA) tasks requiring complex, multi-step reasoning. We outline the types of reasoning required in some of these tasks, and reframe them in terms of meta-level reasoning (akin to high-level strategic reasoning or planning) and object-level reasoning (embodied in lower-level tasks such as mathematical reasoning). Franklin, a novel dataset with requirements of meta- and object-level reasoning, is introduced and used along with three other datasets to evaluate four LLMs at question answering tasks requiring multiple steps of reasoning. Results from human annotation studies suggest LLMs demonstrate meta-level reasoning with high frequency, but struggle with object-level reasoning tasks in some of the datasets used. Additionally, evidence suggests that LLMs find the object-level reasoning required for the questions in the Franklin dataset challenging, yet they do exhibit strong performance with respect to the meta-level reasoning requirements.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 7 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2025.
Builds on
7 of 41 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 6
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
- 2023How well do Large Language Models perform in Arithmetic tasks?cited by 130
- 2023ALIST: Associative Logic for Inference, Storage and Transfer. A Lingua Franca for Inference on the Webcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Exploring the Meta-level Reasoning of Large Language Models via a Tool-based Multi-hop Tabular Question Answering Task
- 2025Is Large Language Model Performance on Reasoning Tasks Impacted by Different Ways Questions Are Asked?
- 2024CLR-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models in College-level Reasoning
- 2025Collective Reasoning Among LLMs: A Framework for Answer Validation Without Ground Truth
- 2025Reasoning Models are Test Exploiters: Rethinking Multiple-Choice
- 2023Getting MoRE out of Mixture of Language Model Reasoning Experts
- 2025Deciphering Trajectory-Aided LLM Reasoning: An Optimization Perspective
- 2025Human-Level Reasoning: A Comparative Study of Large Language Models on Logical and Abstract Reasoning