mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Feasible Counterfactual Explanations: A Taxonomy Guided Template-based NLG Method

arXiv 2310.02019 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2023cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Counterfactual Explanations (cf-XAI) describe the smallest changes in feature values necessary to change an outcome from one class to another. However, many cf-XAI methods neglect the feasibility of those changes. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach for presenting cf-XAI in natural language (Natural-XAI), giving careful consideration to actionable and comprehensible aspects while remaining cognizant of immutability and ethical concerns. We present three contributions to this endeavor. Firstly, through a user study, we identify two types of themes present in cf-XAI composed by humans: content-related, focusing on how features and their values are included from both the counterfactual and the query perspectives; and structure-related, focusing on the structure and terminology used for describing necessary value changes. Secondly, we introduce a feature actionability taxonomy with four clearly defined categories, to streamline the explanation presentation process. Using insights from the user study and our taxonomy, we created a generalisable template-based natural language generation (NLG) method compatible with existing explainers like DICE, NICE, and DisCERN, to produce counterfactuals that address the aforementioned limitations of existing approaches. Finally, we conducted a second user study to assess the performance of our taxonomy-guided NLG templates on three domains. Our findings show that the taxonomy-guided Natural-XAI approach (n-XAI^T) received higher user ratings across all dimensions, with significantly improved results in the majority of the domains assessed for articulation, acceptability, feasibility, and sensitivity dimensions.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2023.

Builds on

14 of 28 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  3. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  4. 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 327
  5. 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
  6. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 232
  7. 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
  8. 2021A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learningcited by 157
  9. 2019Preserving Causal Constraints in Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 143
  10. 2019The Hidden Assumptions Behind Counterfactual Explanations and Principal Reasonscited by 115
  11. 2020NILE : Natural Language Inference with Faithful Natural Language Explanationscited by 96
  12. 2021NICE: An Algorithm for Nearest Instance Counterfactual Explanationscited by 62
2 more
  1. 2020Generating Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Deep Transformers in Financial Text Classificationcited by 40
  2. 2021DisCERN:Discovering Counterfactual Explanations using Relevance Features from Neighbourhoodscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.