mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DINE: Dimensional Interpretability of Node Embeddings

arXiv 2310.01162 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graphs are ubiquitous due to their flexibility in representing social and technological systems as networks of interacting elements. Graph representation learning methods, such as node embeddings, are powerful approaches to map nodes into a latent vector space, allowing their use for various graph tasks. Despite their success, only few studies have focused on explaining node embeddings locally. Moreover, global explanations of node embeddings remain unexplored, limiting interpretability and debugging potentials. We address this gap by developing human-understandable explanations for dimensions in node embeddings. Towards that, we first develop new metrics that measure the global interpretability of embedding vectors based on the marginal contribution of the embedding dimensions to predicting graph structure. We say that an embedding dimension is more interpretable if it can faithfully map to an understandable sub-structure in the input graph - like community structure. Having observed that standard node embeddings have low interpretability, we then introduce DINE (Dimension-based Interpretable Node Embedding), a novel approach that can retrofit existing node embeddings by making them more interpretable without sacrificing their task performance. We conduct extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world graphs and show that we can simultaneously learn highly interpretable node embeddings with effective performance in link prediction.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2023.

Builds on

35 of 90 references.

References · 35

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
  4. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
  5. 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
  6. 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 735
  7. 2017Representation Learning on Graphs: Methods and Applicationscited by 456
  8. 2020Explainability in Graph Neural Networks: A Taxonomic Surveycited by 383
  9. 2018Towards a Definition of Disentangled Representationscited by 294
  10. 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 237
  11. 2016Understanding Neural Networks through Representation Erasurecited by 223
  12. 2020PGM-Explainer: Probabilistic Graphical Model Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 210
23 more
  1. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
  2. 2020Graph Clustering with Graph Neural Networkscited by 163
  3. 2020Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learningcited by 99
  4. 2018GEMSEC: Graph Embedding with Self Clusteringcited by 61
  5. 2017SPINE: SParse Interpretable Neural Embeddingscited by 55
  6. 2019Graph Embedding on Biomedical Networks: Methods, Applications, and Evaluationscited by 50
  7. 2015Sparse Overcomplete Word Vector Representationscited by 43
  8. 2016The ground truth about metadata and community detection in networkscited by 42
  9. 2019Interaction Embeddings for Prediction and Explanation in Knowledge Graphscited by 40
  10. 2021Zorro: Valid, Sparse, and Stable Explanations in Graph Neural Networkscited by 34
  11. 2023PaGE-Link: Path-based Graph Neural Network Explanation for Heterogeneous Link Predictioncited by 25
  12. 2022Modularity-Aware Graph Autoencoders for Joint Community Detection and Link Predictioncited by 22
  13. 2017Semantic Structure and Interpretability of Word Embeddingscited by 21
  14. 2021Can a Fruit Fly Learn Word Embeddings?cited by 17
  15. 2014Community detection in networks: Structural communities versus ground truthcited by 14
  16. 2019ExplaiNE: An Approach for Explaining Network Embedding-based Link Predictionscited by 10
  17. 2019Enhancing Decision Tree based Interpretation of Deep Neural Networks through L1-Orthogonal Regularizationcited by 9
  18. 2019Finding Interpretable Concept Spaces in Node Embeddings using Knowledge Basescited by 7
  19. 2017KATE: K-Competitive Autoencoder for Textcited by 5
  20. 2018Exploring the Semantic Content of Unsupervised Graph Embeddings: An Empirical Studycited by 5
  21. 2022Orthogonal SVD Covariance Conditioning and Latent Disentanglementcited by 5
  22. 2019On the Interpretability and Evaluation of Graph Representation Learningcited by 4
  23. 2023Generating Post-hoc Explanations for Skip-gram-based Node Embeddings by Identifying Important Nodes with Bridgenesscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

8 papers.