Mitigating the Effect of Incidental Correlations on Part-based Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Intelligent systems possess a crucial characteristic of breaking complicated problems into smaller reusable components or parts and adjusting to new tasks using these part representations. However, current part-learners encounter difficulties in dealing with incidental correlations resulting from the limited observations of objects that may appear only in specific arrangements or with specific backgrounds. These incidental correlations may have a detrimental impact on the generalization and interpretability of learned part representations. This study asserts that part-based representations could be more interpretable and generalize better with limited data, employing two innovative regularization methods. The first regularization separates foreground and background information's generative process via a unique mixture-of-parts formulation. Structural constraints are imposed on the parts using a weakly-supervised loss, guaranteeing that the mixture-of-parts for foreground and background entails soft, object-agnostic masks. The second regularization assumes the form of a distillation loss, ensuring the invariance of the learned parts to the incidental background correlations. Furthermore, we incorporate sparse and orthogonal constraints to facilitate learning high-quality part representations. By reducing the impact of incidental background correlations on the learned parts, we exhibit state-of-the-art (SoTA) performance on few-shot learning tasks on benchmark datasets, including MiniImagenet, TieredImageNet, and FC100. We also demonstrate that the part-based representations acquired through our approach generalize better than existing techniques, even under domain shifts of the background and common data corruption on the ImageNet-9 dataset. The implementation is available on GitHub: https://github.com/GauravBh1010tt/DPViT.git
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2023.
Builds on
32 of 59 references.
References · 32
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
- 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
- 2018Meta-Learning for Semi-Supervised Few-Shot Classificationcited by 456
- 2018TADAM: Task dependent adaptive metric for improved few-shot learningcited by 408
- 2018Meta-learning with differentiable closed-form solverscited by 395
- 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 342
- 2016Tagger: Deep Unsupervised Perceptual Groupingcited by 69
- 2019Unsupervised Part-Based Disentangling of Object Shape and Appearancecited by 67
- 2021Rectifying the Shortcut Learning of Background for Few-Shot Learningcited by 51
20 more
- 2018Learning Compositional Representations for Few-Shot Recognitioncited by 50
- 2018Not Using the Car to See the Sidewalk: Quantifying and Controlling the Effects of Context in Classification and Segmentationcited by 49
- 2019Few-Shot Learning via Saliency-guided Hallucination of Samplescited by 49
- 2013Challenges of Big Data Analysiscited by 47
- 2022Rethinking Generalization in Few-Shot Classificationcited by 36
- 2022How to Train Vision Transformer on Small-scale Datasets?cited by 34
- 2022Attribute Surrogates Learning and Spectral Tokens Pooling in Transformers for Few-shot Learningcited by 27
- 2022Matching Feature Sets for Few-Shot Image Classificationcited by 25
- 2019Combining Compositional Models and Deep Networks For Robust Object Classification under Occlusioncited by 24
- 2020Mixture-based Feature Space Learning for Few-shot Image Classificationcited by 23
- 2023Supervised Masked Knowledge Distillation for Few-Shot Transformerscited by 23
- 2022Self-Promoted Supervision for Few-Shot Transformercited by 22
- 2019Unsupervised Discovery of Parts, Structure, and Dynamicscited by 20
- 2022Channel Importance Matters in Few-Shot Image Classificationcited by 20
- 2022Few-Shot Learning Meets Transformer: Unified Query-Support Transformers for Few-Shot Classificationcited by 16
- 2022Rectify ViT Shortcut Learning by Visual Saliencycited by 14
- 2021Unsupervised Co-part Segmentation through Assemblycited by 12
- 2021Label Hallucination for Few-Shot Classificationcited by 11
- 2022TUSK: Task-Agnostic Unsupervised Keypointscited by 5
- 2021CORL: Compositional Representation Learning for Few-Shot Classificationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.
6 papers.
- 2023TIBET: Identifying and Evaluating Biases in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 51
- 2024Animal Identification with Independent Foreground and Background Modelingcited by 7
- 2024FungiTastic: A multi-modal dataset and benchmark for image categorizationcited by 7
- 2025Efficient Calisthenics Skills Classification through Foreground Instance Selection and Depth Estimationcited by 1
- 2025Robust Context-Aware Object Recognitioncited by 1
- 2024Bringing the Context Back into Object Recognition, Robustlycited by 0
- 2025Robust Context-Aware Object Recognition1 Oct 2025
- 2025Efficient Calisthenics Skills Classification through Foreground Instance Selection and Depth Estimation16 Jul 2025
- 2024Bringing the Context Back into Object Recognition, Robustly24 Nov 2024
- 2024FungiTastic: A multi-modal dataset and benchmark for image categorization24 Aug 2024
- 2024Animal Identification with Independent Foreground and Background Modeling23 Aug 2024
- 2023TIBET: Identifying and Evaluating Biases in Text-to-Image Generative Models3 Dec 2023