mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Surgical Tattoos in Infrared: A Dataset for Quantifying Tissue Tracking and Mapping

arXiv 2309.16782 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2023cs.CVcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantifying performance of methods for tracking and mapping tissue in endoscopic environments is essential for enabling image guidance and automation of medical interventions and surgery. Datasets developed so far either use rigid environments, visible markers, or require annotators to label salient points in videos after collection. These are respectively: not general, visible to algorithms, or costly and error-prone. We introduce a novel labeling methodology along with a dataset that uses said methodology, Surgical Tattoos in Infrared (STIR). STIR has labels that are persistent but invisible to visible spectrum algorithms. This is done by labelling tissue points with IR-fluorescent dye, indocyanine green (ICG), and then collecting visible light video clips. STIR comprises hundreds of stereo video clips in both in-vivo and ex-vivo scenes with start and end points labelled in the IR spectrum. With over 3,000 labelled points, STIR will help to quantify and enable better analysis of tracking and mapping methods. After introducing STIR, we analyze multiple different frame-based tracking methods on STIR using both 3D and 2D endpoint error and accuracy metrics. STIR is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/w8g4-g548

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2023.

Builds on

21 of 44 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,415
  2. 2023PointOdyssey: A Large-Scale Synthetic Dataset for Long-Term Point Trackingcited by 276
  3. 2022TAP-Vid: A Benchmark for Tracking Any Point in a Videocited by 263
  4. 2022Particle Video Revisited: Tracking Through Occlusions Using Point Trajectoriescited by 217
  5. 2022Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validationcited by 195
  6. 2023Tracking Everything Everywhere All at Oncecited by 193
  7. 2019The VIA Annotation Software for Images, Audio and Videocited by 167
  8. 2022Neural Rendering for Stereo 3D Reconstruction of Deformable Tissues in Robotic Surgerycited by 123
  9. 2021Stereo Correspondence and Reconstruction of Endoscopic Data Challengecited by 103
  10. 2021Endo-Depth-and-Motion: Reconstruction and Tracking in Endoscopic Videos using Depth Networks and Photometric Constraintscited by 81
  11. 2022Colonoscopy 3D Video Dataset with Paired Depth from 2D-3D Registrationcited by 80
  12. 2023MFT: Long-Term Tracking of Every Pixelcited by 62
9 more
  1. 2019SuPer: A Surgical Perception Framework for Endoscopic Tissue Manipulation with Surgical Roboticscited by 47
  2. 2022CholecTriplet2021: A benchmark challenge for surgical action triplet recognitioncited by 44
  3. 2020SERV-CT: A disparity dataset from CT for validation of endoscopic 3D reconstructioncited by 23
  4. 2022Semantic-SuPer: A Semantic-aware Surgical Perception Framework for Endoscopic Tissue Identification, Reconstruction, and Trackingcited by 19
  5. 2023SurgT challenge: Benchmark of Soft-Tissue Trackers for Robotic Surgerycited by 14
  6. 2023SENDD: Sparse Efficient Neural Depth and Deformation for Tissue Trackingcited by 14
  7. 2021Lighting Enhancement Aids Reconstruction of Colonoscopic Surfacescited by 8
  8. 2021Direct and Sparse Deformable Trackingcited by 7
  9. 2016Autonomous Scanning for Endomicroscopic Mosaicing and 3D Fusioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 10; 2026: 3.

15 papers.

Sort: