mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Point Tracking in Surgery--The 2024 Surgical Tattoos in Infrared (STIR) Challenge

arXiv 2503.24306 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2025cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding tissue motion in surgery is crucial to enable applications in downstream tasks such as segmentation, 3D reconstruction, virtual tissue landmarking, autonomous probe-based scanning, and subtask autonomy. Labeled data are essential to enabling algorithms in these downstream tasks since they allow us to quantify and train algorithms. This paper introduces a point tracking challenge to address this, wherein participants can submit their algorithms for quantification. The submitted algorithms are evaluated using a dataset named surgical tattoos in infrared (STIR), with the challenge aptly named the STIR Challenge 2024. The STIR Challenge 2024 comprises two quantitative components: accuracy and efficiency. The accuracy component tests the accuracy of algorithms on in vivo and ex vivo sequences. The efficiency component tests the latency of algorithm inference. The challenge was conducted as a part of MICCAI EndoVis 2024. In this challenge, we had 8 total teams, with 4 teams submitting before and 4 submitting after challenge day. This paper details the STIR Challenge 2024, which serves to move the field towards more accurate and efficient algorithms for spatial understanding in surgery. In this paper we summarize the design, submissions, and results from the challenge. The challenge dataset is available here: https://zenodo.org/records/14803158 , and the code for baseline models and metric calculation is available here: https://github.com/athaddius/STIRMetrics

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2025.

Builds on

20 of 26 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,415
  2. 2023CoTracker: It is Better to Track Togethercited by 522
  3. 2021RAFT-Stereo: Multilevel Recurrent Field Transforms for Stereo Matchingcited by 353
  4. 2023RoMa: Robust Dense Feature Matchingcited by 302
  5. 2023TAPIR: Tracking Any Point with per-frame Initialization and temporal Refinementcited by 287
  6. 2022TAP-Vid: A Benchmark for Tracking Any Point in a Videocited by 263
  7. 2024SEA-RAFT: Simple, Efficient, Accurate RAFT for Optical Flowcited by 174
  8. 2020Learning by Analogy: Reliable Supervision from Transformations for Unsupervised Optical Flow Estimationcited by 120
  9. 2024BootsTAP: Bootstrapped Training for Tracking-Any-Pointcited by 120
  10. 2023MFT: Long-Term Tracking of Every Pixelcited by 62
  11. 2023Learning How To Robustly Estimate Camera Pose in Endoscopic Videoscited by 50
  12. 2024TAPTR: Tracking Any Point with Transformers as Detectioncited by 45
8 more
  1. 2023Tracking and Mapping in Medical Computer Vision: A Reviewcited by 36
  2. 2023Surgical Tattoos in Infrared: A Dataset for Quantifying Tissue Tracking and Mappingcited by 15
  3. 2023SurgT challenge: Benchmark of Soft-Tissue Trackers for Robotic Surgerycited by 14
  4. 2023SENDD: Sparse Efficient Neural Depth and Deformation for Tissue Trackingcited by 14
  5. 2024Transferring Relative Monocular Depth to Surgical Vision with Temporal Consistencycited by 13
  6. 2020Autonomous Tissue Scanning under Free-Form Motion for Intraoperative Tissue Characterisationcited by 8
  7. 2024MFTIQ: Multi-Flow Tracker with Independent Matching Quality Estimationcited by 7
  8. 2024A-MFST: Adaptive Multi-Flow Sparse Tracker for Real-Time Tissue Tracking Under Occlusioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

7 papers.