Improving Machine Learning Robustness via Adversarial Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As Machine Learning (ML) is increasingly used in solving various tasks in real-world applications, it is crucial to ensure that ML algorithms are robust to any potential worst-case noises, adversarial attacks, and highly unusual situations when they are designed. Studying ML robustness will significantly help in the design of ML algorithms. In this paper, we investigate ML robustness using adversarial training in centralized and decentralized environments, where ML training and testing are conducted in one or multiple computers. In the centralized environment, we achieve a test accuracy of 65.41% and 83.0% when classifying adversarial examples generated by Fast Gradient Sign Method and DeepFool, respectively. Comparing to existing studies, these results demonstrate an improvement of 18.41% for FGSM and 47% for DeepFool. In the decentralized environment, we study Federated learning (FL) robustness by using adversarial training with independent and identically distributed (IID) and non-IID data, respectively, where CIFAR-10 is used in this research. In the IID data case, our experimental results demonstrate that we can achieve such a robust accuracy that it is comparable to the one obtained in the centralized environment. Moreover, in the non-IID data case, the natural accuracy drops from 66.23% to 57.82%, and the robust accuracy decreases by 25% and 23.4% in C&W and Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) attacks, compared to the IID data case, respectively. We further propose an IID data-sharing approach, which allows for increasing the natural accuracy to 85.04% and the robust accuracy from 57% to 72% in C&W attacks and from 59% to 67% in PGD attacks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2023.
Builds on
25 of 38 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
13 more
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
- 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,108
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
- 2019Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applicationscited by 412
- 2018Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0cited by 215
- 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 214
- 2019Overcoming Forgetting in Federated Learning on Non-IID Datacited by 120
- 2020FAT: Federated Adversarial Trainingcited by 24
- 2021ML Attack Models: Adversarial Attacks and Data Poisoning Attackscited by 24
- 2021Adversarial training in communication constrained federated learningcited by 17
- 2021Certifiably-Robust Federated Adversarial Learning via Randomized Smoothingcited by 9
- 2020An Adversarial Attack Defending System for Securing In-Vehicle Networkscited by 8
- 2021Certified Federated Adversarial Trainingcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.