An Adversarial Attack Defending System for Securing In-Vehicle Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In a modern vehicle, there are over seventy Electronics Control Units (ECUs). For an in-vehicle network, ECUs communicate with each other by following a standard communication protocol, such as Controller Area Network (CAN). However, an attacker can easily access the in-vehicle network to compromise ECUs through a WLAN or Bluetooth. Though there are various deep learning (DL) methods suggested for securing in-vehicle networks, recent studies on adversarial examples have shown that attackers can easily fool DL models. In this research, we further explore adversarial examples in an in-vehicle network. We first discover and implement two adversarial attack models that are harmful to a Long Short Term Memory (LSTM)-based detection model used in the in-vehicle network. Then, we propose an Adversarial Attack Defending System (AADS) for securing an in-vehicle network. Specifically, we focus on brake-related ECUs in an in-vehicle network. Our experimental results demonstrate that adversaries can easily attack the LSTM-based detection model with a success rate of over 98%, and the proposed AADS achieves over 99% accuracy for detecting adversarial attacks.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2021ML Attack Models: Adversarial Attacks and Data Poisoning Attackscited by 23
- 2023Improving Machine Learning Robustness via Adversarial Trainingcited by 1
- 2022Statistical Detection of Adversarial examples in Blockchain-based Federated Forest In-vehicle Network Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 0
- 2025A Survey of Learning-Based Intrusion Detection Systems for In-Vehicle Networkcited by 0
- 2025SDN-Based False Data Detection With Its Mitigation and Machine Learning Robustness for In-Vehicle Networkscited by 0
- 2025Assessing the Resilience of Automotive Intrusion Detection Systems to Adversarial Manipulationcited by 0
- 2025Studying Various Activation Functions and Non-IID Data for Machine Learning Model Robustnesscited by 0
- 2026SoK: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Current Status of Neural Tangent Generalization Attacks with Research Directionscited by 0
- 2026SoK: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Current Status of Neural Tangent Generalization Attacks with Research Directions12 May 2026
- 2025Studying Various Activation Functions and Non-IID Data for Machine Learning Model Robustness3 Dec 2025
- 2025Assessing the Resilience of Automotive Intrusion Detection Systems to Adversarial Manipulation12 Jun 2025
- 2025SDN-Based False Data Detection With Its Mitigation and Machine Learning Robustness for In-Vehicle Networks6 Jun 2025
- 2025A Survey of Learning-Based Intrusion Detection Systems for In-Vehicle Network15 May 2025
- 2023Improving Machine Learning Robustness via Adversarial Training22 Sep 2023
- 2022Statistical Detection of Adversarial examples in Blockchain-based Federated Forest In-vehicle Network Intrusion Detection Systems11 Jul 2022
- 2021ML Attack Models: Adversarial Attacks and Data Poisoning Attacks6 Dec 2021