mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Is it Possible to Modify Text to a Target Readability Level? An Initial Investigation Using Zero-Shot Large Language Models

arXiv 2309.12551 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2023cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text simplification is a common task where the text is adapted to make it easier to understand. Similarly, text elaboration can make a passage more sophisticated, offering a method to control the complexity of reading comprehension tests. However, text simplification and elaboration tasks are limited to only relatively alter the readability of texts. It is useful to directly modify the readability of any text to an absolute target readability level to cater to a diverse audience. Ideally, the readability of readability-controlled generated text should be independent of the source text. Therefore, we propose a novel readability-controlled text modification task. The task requires the generation of 8 versions at various target readability levels for each input text. We introduce novel readability-controlled text modification metrics. The baselines for this task use ChatGPT and Llama-2, with an extension approach introducing a two-step process (generating paraphrases by passing through the language model twice). The zero-shot approaches are able to push the readability of the paraphrases in the desired direction but the final readability remains correlated with the original text's readability. We also find greater drops in semantic and lexical similarity between the source and target texts with greater shifts in the readability.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2023.

Builds on

26 of 67 references.

References · 26

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  5. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  6. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  7. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  8. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,984
  9. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,470
  10. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 799
  11. 2021DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Expertscited by 441
  12. 2020GeDi: Generative Discriminator Guided Sequence Generationcited by 378
14 more
  1. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Pretrained Foundation Models: A History from BERT to ChatGPTcited by 368
  2. 2022A Survey of Controllable Text Generation using Transformer-based Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 129
  3. 2020A Distributional Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 119
  4. 2020Investigating Pretrained Language Models for Graph-to-Text Generationcited by 117
  5. 2017Controllable Abstractive Summarizationcited by 110
  6. 2018Data-to-Text Generation with Content Selection and Planningcited by 106
  7. 2016Controlling Output Length in Neural Encoder-Decoderscited by 75
  8. 2018Content preserving text generation with attribute controlscited by 47
  9. 2020Syntax-guided Controlled Generation of Paraphrasescited by 47
  10. 2020A Survey on Machine Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 41
  11. 2021Document-Level Text Simplification: Dataset, Criteria and Baselinecited by 27
  12. 2021Parallel Refinements for Lexically Constrained Text Generation with BARTcited by 24
  13. 2020A Survey on Text Simplificationcited by 13
  14. 2021Towards Document-Level Paraphrase Generation with Sentence Rewriting and Reorderingcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.