mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Accuracy: Measuring Representation Capacity of Embeddings to Preserve Structural and Contextual Information

arXiv 2309.11294 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Effective representation of data is crucial in various machine learning tasks, as it captures the underlying structure and context of the data. Embeddings have emerged as a powerful technique for data representation, but evaluating their quality and capacity to preserve structural and contextual information remains a challenge. In this paper, we address this need by proposing a method to measure the textitrepresentation capacity of embeddings. The motivation behind this work stems from the importance of understanding the strengths and limitations of embeddings, enabling researchers and practitioners to make informed decisions in selecting appropriate embedding models for their specific applications. By combining extrinsic evaluation methods, such as classification and clustering, with t-SNE-based neighborhood analysis, such as neighborhood agreement and trustworthiness, we provide a comprehensive assessment of the representation capacity. Additionally, the use of optimization techniques (bayesian optimization) for weight optimization (for classification, clustering, neighborhood agreement, and trustworthiness) ensures an objective and data-driven approach in selecting the optimal combination of metrics. The proposed method not only contributes to advancing the field of embedding evaluation but also empowers researchers and practitioners with a quantitative measure to assess the effectiveness of embeddings in capturing structural and contextual information. For the evaluation, we use 3 real-world biological sequence (proteins and nucleotide) datasets and performed representation capacity analysis of 4 embedding methods from the literature, namely Spike2Vec, Spaced k-mers, PWM2Vec, and AutoEncoder.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2023.

Builds on

18 of 46 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Unsupervised Deep Embedding for Clustering Analysiscited by 767
  2. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
  3. 2016Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baselinecited by 360
  4. 2020A Survey on Heterogeneous Graph Embedding: Methods, Techniques, Applications and Sourcescited by 126
  5. 2020Towards Learning a Universal Non-Semantic Representation of Speechcited by 84
  6. 2019Evaluating Word Embedding Models: Methods and Experimental Resultscited by 37
  7. 2021Spike2Vec: An Efficient and Scalable Embedding Approach for COVID-19 Spike Sequencescited by 30
  8. 2018A Comparison of Word Embeddings for the Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 29
  9. 2021A k-mer Based Approach for SARS-CoV-2 Variant Identificationcited by 23
  10. 2022PWM2Vec: An Efficient Embedding Approach for Viral Host Specification from Coronavirus Spike Sequencescited by 22
  11. 2017Efficient Approximation Algorithms for String Kernel Based Sequence Classificationcited by 20
  12. 2014Deep Learning for Answer Sentence Selectioncited by 17
6 more
  1. 2021Robust Representation and Efficient Feature Selection Allows for Effective Clustering of SARS-CoV-2 Variantscited by 14
  2. 2017Portuguese Word Embeddings: Evaluating on Word Analogies and Natural Language Taskscited by 13
  3. 2018MetaGraph2Vec: Complex Semantic Path Augmented Heterogeneous Network Embeddingcited by 13
  4. 2017GaKCo: a Fast GApped k-mer string Kernel using COuntingcited by 11
  5. 2022Informative Initialization and Kernel Selection Improves t-SNE for Biological Sequencescited by 5
  6. 2017Intelligent Word Embeddings of Free-Text Radiology Reportscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.