mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Realistic Website Fingerprinting By Augmenting Network Trace

arXiv 2309.10147 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2023cs.CR cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Website Fingerprinting (WF) is considered a major threat to the anonymity of Tor users (and other anonymity systems). While state-of-the-art WF techniques have claimed high attack accuracies, e.g., by leveraging Deep Neural Networks (DNN), several recent works have questioned the practicality of such WF attacks in the real world due to the assumptions made in the design and evaluation of these attacks. In this work, we argue that such impracticality issues are mainly due to the attacker's inability in collecting training data in comprehensive network conditions, e.g., a WF classifier may be trained only on samples collected on specific high-bandwidth network links but deployed on connections with different network conditions. We show that augmenting network traces can enhance the performance of WF classifiers in unobserved network conditions. Specifically, we introduce NetAugment, an augmentation technique tailored to the specifications of Tor traces. We instantiate NetAugment through semi-supervised and self-supervised learning techniques. Our extensive open-world and close-world experiments demonstrate that under practical evaluation settings, our WF attacks provide superior performances compared to the state-of-the-art; this is due to their use of augmented network traces for training, which allows them to learn the features of target traffic in unobserved settings. For instance, with a 5-shot learning in a closed-world scenario, our self-supervised WF attack (named NetCLR) reaches up to 80% accuracy when the traces for evaluation are collected in a setting unobserved by the WF adversary. This is compared to an accuracy of 64.4% achieved by the state-of-the-art Triplet Fingerprinting [35]. We believe that the promising results of our work can encourage the use of network trace augmentation in other types of network traffic analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2023.

Builds on

14 of 48 references.

References · 14

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  2. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  3. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
  4. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  5. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  6. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
  7. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  8. 2016Regularization With Stochastic Transformations and Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 441
  9. 2014Learning with Pseudo-Ensemblescited by 241
  10. 2018Deep Fingerprinting: Undermining Website Fingerprinting Defenses with Deep Learningcited by 43
  11. 2015k-fingerprinting: a Robust Scalable Website Fingerprinting Techniquecited by 34
  12. 2017Automated Website Fingerprinting through Deep Learningcited by 21
2 more
  1. 2019Tik-Tok: The Utility of Packet Timing in Website Fingerprinting Attackscited by 15
  2. 2013DOBBS: Towards a Comprehensive Dataset to Study the Browsing Behavior of Online Userscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

10 papers.