mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Tik-Tok: The Utility of Packet Timing in Website Fingerprinting Attacks

arXiv 1902.06421 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2019cs.CRcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A passive local eavesdropper can leverage Website Fingerprinting (WF) to deanonymize the web browsing activity of Tor users. The value of timing information to WF has often been discounted in recent works due to the volatility of low-level timing information. In this paper, we more carefully examine the extent to which packet timing can be used to facilitate WF attacks. We first propose a new set of timing-related features based on burst-level characteristics to further identify more ways that timing patterns could be used by classifiers to identify sites. Then we evaluate the effectiveness of both raw timing and directional timing which is a combination of raw timing and direction in a deep-learning-based WF attack. Our closed-world evaluation shows that directional timing performs best in most of the settings we explored, achieving: (i) 98.4% in undefended Tor traffic; (ii) 93.5% on WTF-PAD traffic, several points higher than when only directional information is used; and (iii) 64.7% against onion sites, 12% higher than using only direction. Further evaluations in the open-world setting show small increases in both precision (+2%) and recall (+6%) with directional-timing on WTF-PAD traffic. To further investigate the value of timing information, we perform an information leakage analysis on our proposed handcrafted features. Our results show that while timing features leak less information than directional features, the information contained in each feature is mutually exclusive to one another and can thus improve the robustness of a classifier.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 6.

15 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Realistic Website Fingerprinting By Augmenting Network Tracecited by 10
  2. 2022Extensible Machine Learning for Encrypted Network Traffic Application Labeling via Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 9
  3. 2024Robust and Reliable Early-Stage Website Fingerprinting Attacks via Spatial-Temporal Distribution Analysiscited by 8
  4. 2024TrapFlow: Controllable Website Fingerprinting Defense via Dynamic Backdoor Learningcited by 5
  5. 2024Towards Fine-Grained Webpage Fingerprinting at Scalecited by 3
  6. 2026ResAware: Cross-Environment Website Fingerprinting via Resource-Privileged Distillationcited by 2
  7. 2025Fingerprinting Deep Learning Models via Network Traffic Patterns in Federated Learningcited by 1
  8. 2026CipherSight: Robust Website Fingerprinting via Record-Resource Semantic Supervision under Distribution Shiftscited by 1
  9. 2026Pruned Traffic Trees: Native Semantic Compression with a Protocol-Structured Model Family for Encrypted Traffic Classificationcited by 1
  10. 2026A Large-Scale Benchmark and Risk Assessment of Traffic Analysis Attacks on Cloud LLM Servicescited by 1
  11. 2024Examining the Rat in the Tunnel: Interpretable Multi-Label Classification of Tor-based Malwarecited by 0
  12. 2025Attack Smarter: Attention-Driven Fine-Grained Webpage Fingerprinting Attackscited by 0
3 more
  1. 2025Beyond a Single Perspective: Towards a Realistic Evaluation of Website Fingerprinting Attackscited by 0
  2. 2026Tracing the Chain: Deep Learning for Stepping-Stone Intrusion Detectioncited by 0
  3. 2026FlowAtom: Atom-Based Evidence Aggregation for Multi-Label Website Fingerprintingcited by 0