mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Ensuring Topological Data-Structure Preservation under Autoencoder Compression due to Latent Space Regularization in Gauss--Legendre nodes

arXiv 2309.08228 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2023cs.LG math.DGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We formulate a data independent latent space regularisation constraint for general unsupervised autoencoders. The regularisation rests on sampling the autoencoder Jacobian in Legendre nodes, being the centre of the Gauss-Legendre quadrature. Revisiting this classic enables to prove that regularised autoencoders ensure a one-to-one re-embedding of the initial data manifold to its latent representation. Demonstrations show that prior proposed regularisation strategies, such as contractive autoencoding, cause topological defects already for simple examples, and so do convolutional based (variational) autoencoders. In contrast, topological preservation is ensured already by standard multilayer perceptron neural networks when being regularised due to our contribution. This observation extends through the classic FashionMNIST dataset up to real world encoding problems for MRI brain scans, suggesting that, across disciplines, reliable low dimensional representations of complex high-dimensional datasets can be delivered due to this regularisation technique.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2023.

Builds on

17 of 81 references.

References · 17

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,650
  4. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  5. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 846
  6. 2018Understanding disentangling in β-VAEcited by 332
  7. 2019On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction - Does AI come at a cost?cited by 211
  8. 2019Topological Autoencoderscited by 124
  9. 2017Fairness Testing: Testing Software for Discriminationcited by 123
  10. 2018Variational Autoencoders Pursue PCA Directions (by Accident)cited by 84
  11. 2020On Implicit Regularization in β-VAEscited by 34
  12. 2019Robustness Verification of Tree-based Modelscited by 33
5 more
  1. 2021Local Disentanglement in Variational Auto-Encoders Using Jacobian L1 Regularizationcited by 17
  2. 2017Towards Understanding the Invertibility of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 10
  3. 2022Replacing Automatic Differentiation by Sobolev Cubatures fastens Physics Informed Neural Nets and strengthens their Approximation Powercited by 4
  4. 2021Data-Driven Shadowgraph Simulation of a 3D Objectcited by 3
  5. 2023Learning Partial Differential Equations by Spectral Approximates of General Sobolev Spacescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.