Explaining Speech Classification Models via Word-Level Audio Segments and Paralinguistic Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in eXplainable AI (XAI) have provided new insights into how models for vision, language, and tabular data operate. However, few approaches exist for understanding speech models. Existing work focuses on a few spoken language understanding (SLU) tasks, and explanations are difficult to interpret for most users. We introduce a new approach to explain speech classification models. We generate easy-to-interpret explanations via input perturbation on two information levels. 1) Word-level explanations reveal how each word-related audio segment impacts the outcome. 2) Paralinguistic features (e.g., prosody and background noise) answer the counterfactual: ``What would the model prediction be if we edited the audio signal in this way?'' We validate our approach by explaining two state-of-the-art SLU models on two speech classification tasks in English and Italian. Our findings demonstrate that the explanations are faithful to the model's inner workings and plausible to humans. Our method and findings pave the way for future research on interpreting speech models.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2023.
Builds on
33 of 56 references.
References · 33
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 4,057
- 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,905
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2021SUPERB: Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmarkcited by 666
- 2021XLS-R: Self-supervised Cross-lingual Speech Representation Learning at Scalecited by 601
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
21 more
- 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 530
- 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 521
- 2023WhisperX: Time-Accurate Speech Transcription of Long-Form Audiocited by 326
- 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
- 2019Speech Model Pre-training for End-to-End Spoken Language Understandingcited by 193
- 2020A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classificationcited by 159
- 2022OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanationscited by 126
- 2021TorchAudio: Building Blocks for Audio and Speech Processingcited by 83
- 2021Contrastive Explanations for Model Interpretabilitycited by 75
- 2016"What is Relevant in a Text Document?": An Interpretable Machine Learning Approachcited by 53
- 2021Discretized Integrated Gradients for Explaining Language Modelscited by 46
- 2019Toward Interpretable Music Tagging with Self-Attentioncited by 30
- 2022Toward Fairness in Speech Recognition: Discovery and mitigation of performance disparitiescited by 28
- 2021Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for Evaluating Model Explanationscited by 26
- 2022Human Interpretation of Saliency-based Explanation Over Textcited by 25
- 2023Improving Fairness and Robustness in End-to-End Speech Recognition through unsupervised clusteringcited by 11
- 2023Can We Trust Explainable AI Methods on ASR? An Evaluation on Phoneme Recognitioncited by 10
- 2023ITALIC: An Italian Intent Classification Datasetcited by 10
- 2023Explanations for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 8
- 2023XAI-based Comparison of Input Representations for Audio Event Classificationcited by 3
- 2021Interpreting deep urban sound classification using Layer-wise Relevance Propagationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024Twists, Humps, and Pebbles: Multilingual Speech Recognition Models Exhibit Gender Performance Gapscited by 25
- 2024SPES: Spectrogram Perturbation for Explainable Speech-to-Text Generationcited by 6
- 2026Identifying and typifying demographic unfairness in phoneme-level embeddings of self-supervised speech recognition modelscited by 2
- 2025On the reliability of feature attribution methods for speech classificationcited by 1
- 2025Cross-Attention is Half Explanation in Speech-to-Text Modelscited by 1
- 2025"KAN you hear me?" Exploring Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for Spoken Language Understandingcited by 0
- 2025A Concept-based approach to Voice Disorder Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Identifying and typifying demographic unfairness in phoneme-level embeddings of self-supervised speech recognition models24 Apr 2026
- 2025Cross-Attention is Half Explanation in Speech-to-Text Models22 Sep 2025
- 2025A Concept-based approach to Voice Disorder Detection23 Jul 2025
- 2025"KAN you hear me?" Exploring Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for Spoken Language Understanding26 May 2025
- 2025On the reliability of feature attribution methods for speech classification22 May 2025
- 2024SPES: Spectrogram Perturbation for Explainable Speech-to-Text Generation3 Nov 2024
- 2024Twists, Humps, and Pebbles: Multilingual Speech Recognition Models Exhibit Gender Performance Gaps28 Feb 2024