mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can Large Language Models Discern Evidence for Scientific Hypotheses? Case Studies in the Social Sciences

arXiv 2309.06578 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hypothesis formulation and testing are central to empirical research. A strong hypothesis is a best guess based on existing evidence and informed by a comprehensive view of relevant literature. However, with exponential increase in the number of scientific articles published annually, manual aggregation and synthesis of evidence related to a given hypothesis is a challenge. Our work explores the ability of current large language models (LLMs) to discern evidence in support or refute of specific hypotheses based on the text of scientific abstracts. We share a novel dataset for the task of scientific hypothesis evidencing using community-driven annotations of studies in the social sciences. We compare the performance of LLMs to several state-of-the-art benchmarks and highlight opportunities for future research in this area. The dataset is available at https://github.com/Sai90000/ScientificHypothesisEvidencing.git

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2023.

Builds on

27 of 44 references.

References · 27

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  4. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,413
  5. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  6. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  7. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
  8. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,847
  9. 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,162
  10. 2020Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claimscited by 554
  11. 2021A Survey on Automated Fact-Checkingcited by 378
  12. 2019Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Natural Language Understandingcited by 350
15 more
  1. 2022Making Large Language Models Better Reasoners with Step-Aware Verifiercited by 233
  2. 2020Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claimscited by 211
  3. 2023Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4cited by 202
  4. 2016Enhanced LSTM for Natural Language Inferencecited by 200
  5. 2020CLIMATE-FEVER: A Dataset for Verification of Real-World Climate Claimscited by 196
  6. 2022Large Language Models are Few-shot Testers: Exploring LLM-based General Bug Reproductioncited by 111
  7. 2021COVID-Fact: Fact Extraction and Verification of Real-World Claims on COVID-19 Pandemiccited by 100
  8. 2022SciFact-Open: Towards open-domain scientific claim verificationcited by 94
  9. 2023UPRISE: Universal Prompt Retrieval for Improving Zero-Shot Evaluationcited by 75
  10. 2023ChatGPT as a Factual Inconsistency Evaluator for Text Summarizationcited by 75
  11. 2018A Survey on Natural Language Processing for Fake News Detectioncited by 67
  12. 2023Scientific Fact-Checking: A Survey of Resources and Approachescited by 54
  13. 2020Scientific Claim Verification with VERT5ERINIcited by 47
  14. 2023Pushing the Limits of ChatGPT on NLP Taskscited by 27
  15. 2023Simple Linguistic Inferences of Large Language Models (LLMs): Blind Spots and Blindscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.