mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How to Evaluate Semantic Communications for Images with ViTScore Metric?

arXiv 2309.04891 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2023cs.CV cs.AI cs.ITcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Semantic communications (SC) have been expected to be a new paradigm shifting to catalyze the next generation communication, whose main concerns shift from accurate bit transmission to effective semantic information exchange in communications. However, the previous and widely-used metrics for images are not applicable to evaluate the image semantic similarity in SC. Classical metrics to measure the similarity between two images usually rely on the pixel level or the structural level, such as the PSNR and the MS-SSIM. Straightforwardly using some tailored metrics based on deep-learning methods in CV community, such as the LPIPS, is infeasible for SC. To tackle this, inspired by BERTScore in NLP community, we propose a novel metric for evaluating image semantic similarity, named Vision Transformer Score (ViTScore). We prove theoretically that ViTScore has 3 important properties, including symmetry, boundedness, and normalization, which make ViTScore convenient and intuitive for image measurement. To evaluate the performance of ViTScore, we compare ViTScore with 3 typical metrics (PSNR, MS-SSIM, and LPIPS) through 4 classes of experiments: (i) correlation with BERTScore through evaluation of image caption downstream CV task, (ii) evaluation in classical image communications, (iii) evaluation in image semantic communication systems, and (iv) evaluation in image semantic communication systems with semantic attack. Experimental results demonstrate that ViTScore is robust and efficient in evaluating the semantic similarity of images. Particularly, ViTScore outperforms the other 3 typical metrics in evaluating the image semantic changes by semantic attack, such as image inverse with Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). This indicates that ViTScore is an effective performance metric when deployed in SC scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2023.

Builds on

41 of 69 references.

References · 41

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  5. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  6. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  7. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  8. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  9. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  10. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  11. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,678
  12. 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,350
29 more
  1. 2017The Perception-Distortion Tradeoffcited by 582
  2. 2020In-Domain GAN Inversion for Real Image Editingcited by 420
  3. 2021GAN Inversion: A Surveycited by 366
  4. 2020Deep Learning Enabled Semantic Communication Systemscited by 282
  5. 2017An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layercited by 227
  6. 2014Learning Fine-grained Image Similarity with Deep Rankingcited by 189
  7. 2022Beyond Transmitting Bits: Context, Semantics, and Task-Oriented Communicationscited by 166
  8. 2017Visual Translation Embedding Network for Visual Relation Detectioncited by 112
  9. 2021Semantic Communications: Principles and Challengescited by 90
  10. 2021Nonlinear Transform Source-Channel Coding for Semantic Communicationscited by 73
  11. 2021Task-Oriented Multi-User Semantic Communicationscited by 72
  12. 2020Wireless Image Retrieval at the Edgecited by 57
  13. 2020Toward a 6G AI-Native Air Interfacecited by 54
  14. 2022Robust Semantic Communications with Masked VQ-VAE Enabled Codebookcited by 53
  15. 2020From Semantic Communication to Semantic-aware Networking: Model, Architecture, and Open Problemscited by 51
  16. 2021Task-Oriented Multi-User Semantic Communications for VQA Taskcited by 47
  17. 2020Bandwidth-Agile Image Transmission with Deep Joint Source-Channel Codingcited by 42
  18. 2018A Very Brief Introduction to Machine Learning With Applications to Communication Systemscited by 35
  19. 2022Towards Semantic Communications: Deep Learning-Based Image Semantic Codingcited by 35
  20. 2018Large-Scale Visual Relationship Understandingcited by 33
  21. 2021Task-Oriented Image Transmission for Scene Classification in Unmanned Aerial Systemscited by 29
  22. 2021Rethinking Modern Communication from Semantic Coding to Semantic Communicationcited by 23
  23. 2021Semantics-Native Communication with Contextual Reasoningcited by 21
  24. 2021Learning Semantics: An Opportunity for Effective 6G Communicationscited by 19
  25. 2022Robust Semantic Communications Against Semantic Noisecited by 15
  26. 2022Perceptual Learned Source-Channel Coding for High-Fidelity Image Semantic Transmissioncited by 12
  27. 2021Common Language for Goal-Oriented Semantic Communications: A Curriculum Learning Frameworkcited by 11
  28. 2022Rethinking Wireless Communication Security in Semantic Internet of Thingscited by 11
  29. 2022Generative Model Based Highly Efficient Semantic Communication Approach for Image Transmissioncited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

6 papers.