Rethinking Wireless Communication Security in Semantic Internet of Things
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Semantic communication is an important participant in the next generation of wireless communications. Enabled by this novel paradigm, the conventional Internet-of-Things (IoT) is evolving toward the semantic IoT (SIoT) to achieve significant system performance improvements. However, traditional wireless communication security techniques for bit transmission cannot be applied directly to the SIoT that focuses on semantic information transmission. One key reason is the lack of new security performance indicators. Thus, we have to rethink the wireless communication security in the SIoT. As such, in the paper, we analyze and compare classical security techniques, i.e., physical layer security, covert communications, and encryption, from the perspective of semantic information security. We highlight the differences among these security techniques when applied to the SIoT. Novel performance indicators such as semantic secrecy outage probability (for physical layer security techniques) and detection failure probability (for covert communication techniques) are proposed. Considering that semantic communications can raise new security issues, we then review attack and defense methods at the semantic level. Finally, we present several promising directions for future secure SIoT research.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2023Enhancing Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Tutorial on Generative Diffusion Models in Network Optimizationcited by 56
- 2023Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Semantic Communication in Vehicular Metaversescited by 7
- 2023How to Evaluate Semantic Communications for Images with ViTScore Metric?cited by 6
- 2023Towards Ubiquitous Semantic Metaverse: Challenges, Approaches, and Opportunitiescited by 4
- 2023The Model Inversion Eavesdropping Attack in Semantic Communication Systemscited by 3
- 2024VideoQA-SC: Adaptive Semantic Communication for Video Question Answeringcited by 3
- 2023Asymmetric Diffusion Based Channel-Adaptive Secure Wireless Semantic Communicationscited by 2
- 2024Toward Mixture-of-Experts Enabled Trustworthy Semantic Communication for 6G Networkscited by 2
- 2026Adaptive Dual-Path Framework for Covert Semantic Communicationcited by 1
- 2025Trustworthy Semantic Communication for Vehicular Networks: Challenges and Solutionscited by 0
- 2026A Survey on Semantic Communication for Vision: Categories, Frameworks, Enabling Techniques, and Applicationscited by 0
- 2026Adaptive Dual-Path Framework for Covert Semantic Communication5 May 2026
- 2026A Survey on Semantic Communication for Vision: Categories, Frameworks, Enabling Techniques, and Applications29 Jan 2026
- 2025Trustworthy Semantic Communication for Vehicular Networks: Challenges and Solutions25 Sep 2025
- 2024Toward Mixture-of-Experts Enabled Trustworthy Semantic Communication for 6G Networks24 Sep 2024
- 2024VideoQA-SC: Adaptive Semantic Communication for Video Question Answering17 May 2024
- 2023Asymmetric Diffusion Based Channel-Adaptive Secure Wireless Semantic Communications30 Oct 2023
- 2023How to Evaluate Semantic Communications for Images with ViTScore Metric?9 Sep 2023
- 2023Enhancing Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Tutorial on Generative Diffusion Models in Network Optimization10 Aug 2023
- 2023The Model Inversion Eavesdropping Attack in Semantic Communication Systems8 Aug 2023
- 2023Towards Ubiquitous Semantic Metaverse: Challenges, Approaches, and Opportunities13 Jul 2023
- 2023Adversarial Attacks and Defenses for Semantic Communication in Vehicular Metaverses6 Jun 2023