Interactive Hyperparameter Optimization in Multi-Objective Problems via Preference Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) is important to leverage the full potential of machine learning (ML). In practice, users are often interested in multi-objective (MO) problems, i.e., optimizing potentially conflicting objectives, like accuracy and energy consumption. To tackle this, the vast majority of MO-ML algorithms return a Pareto front of non-dominated machine learning models to the user. Optimizing the hyperparameters of such algorithms is non-trivial as evaluating a hyperparameter configuration entails evaluating the quality of the resulting Pareto front. In literature, there are known indicators that assess the quality of a Pareto front (e.g., hypervolume, R2) by quantifying different properties (e.g., volume, proximity to a reference point). However, choosing the indicator that leads to the desired Pareto front might be a hard task for a user. In this paper, we propose a human-centered interactive HPO approach tailored towards multi-objective ML leveraging preference learning to extract desiderata from users that guide the optimization. Instead of relying on the user guessing the most suitable indicator for their needs, our approach automatically learns an appropriate indicator. Concretely, we leverage pairwise comparisons of distinct Pareto fronts to learn such an appropriate quality indicator. Then, we optimize the hyperparameters of the underlying MO-ML algorithm towards this learned indicator using a state-of-the-art HPO approach. In an experimental study targeting the environmental impact of ML, we demonstrate that our approach leads to substantially better Pareto fronts compared to optimizing based on a wrong indicator pre-selected by the user, and performs comparable in the case of an advanced user knowing which indicator to pick.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2023.
Builds on
17 of 50 references.
References · 17
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 734
- 2019Green AIcited by 620
- 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 466
- 2021SMAC3: A Versatile Bayesian Optimization Package for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 229
- 2020pymoo: Multi-objective Optimization in Pythoncited by 196
- 2021Hyperparameter Optimization: Foundations, Algorithms, Best Practices and Open Challengescited by 143
- 2022πBO: Augmenting Acquisition Functions with User Beliefs for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 69
- 2022Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization in Machine Learning -- An Overviewcited by 37
- 2021Explaining Hyperparameter Optimization via Partial Dependence Plotscited by 35
- 2023PriorBand: Practical Hyperparameter Optimization in the Age of Deep Learningcited by 31
- 2022Learning Curves for Decision Making in Supervised Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 27
5 more
- 2021Towards Green Automated Machine Learning: Status Quo and Future Directionscited by 25
- 2021A survey on multi-objective hyperparameter optimization algorithms for Machine Learningcited by 24
- 2022DeepCAVE: An Interactive Analysis Tool for Automated Machine Learningcited by 14
- 2019Towards Human Centered AutoMLcited by 5
- 2018Deep Architectures for Learning Context-dependent Ranking Functionscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2023Looping in the Human Collaborative and Explainable Bayesian Optimizationcited by 27
- 2024Position: A Call to Action for a Human-Centered AutoML Paradigmcited by 14
- 2024Leveraging Sub-Optimal Data for Human-in-the-Loop Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
- 2024Towards certifiable AI in aviation: landscape, challenges, and opportunitiescited by 2
- 2025Interactive Multi-Objective Probabilistic Preference Learning with Soft and Hard Boundscited by 2
- 2025An Interactive Framework for Finding the Optimal Trade-off in Differential Privacycited by 1
- 2025Optimization Problem Solving Can Transition to Evolutionary Agentic Workflowscited by 0
- 2026Provably Reduced Sample Cost in Prior-Guided Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Provably Reduced Sample Cost in Prior-Guided Hyperparameter Optimization3 Jun 2026
- 2025An Interactive Framework for Finding the Optimal Trade-off in Differential Privacy4 Sep 2025
- 2025Interactive Multi-Objective Probabilistic Preference Learning with Soft and Hard Bounds27 Jun 2025
- 2025Optimization Problem Solving Can Transition to Evolutionary Agentic Workflows7 May 2025
- 2024Towards certifiable AI in aviation: landscape, challenges, and opportunities13 Sep 2024
- 2024Position: A Call to Action for a Human-Centered AutoML Paradigm5 Jun 2024
- 2024Leveraging Sub-Optimal Data for Human-in-the-Loop Reinforcement Learning30 Apr 2024
- 2023Looping in the Human Collaborative and Explainable Bayesian Optimization26 Oct 2023