SWAP: Exploiting Second-Ranked Logits for Adversarial Attacks on Time Series
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Time series classification (TSC) has emerged as a critical task in various domains, and deep neural models have shown superior performance in TSC tasks. However, these models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where subtle perturbations can significantly impact the prediction results. Existing adversarial methods often suffer from over-parameterization or random logit perturbation, hindering their effectiveness. Additionally, increasing the attack success rate (ASR) typically involves generating more noise, making the attack more easily detectable. To address these limitations, we propose SWAP, a novel attacking method for TSC models. SWAP focuses on enhancing the confidence of the second-ranked logits while minimizing the manipulation of other logits. This is achieved by minimizing the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the target logit distribution and the predictive logit distribution. Experimental results demonstrate that SWAP achieves state-of-the-art performance, with an ASR exceeding 50% and an 18% increase compared to existing methods.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2023.
Builds on
16 of 29 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2018The UCR Time Series Archivecited by 431
- 2019InceptionTime: Finding AlexNet for Time Series Classificationcited by 387
- 2017Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learningcited by 351
- 2016Deep Spatio-Temporal Residual Networks for Citywide Crowd Flows Predictioncited by 333
- 2021Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A surveycited by 127
- 2019Black-box Adversarial Attacks on Video Recognition Modelscited by 58
- 2023Decoupled Kullback-Leibler Divergence Losscited by 58
- 2019Adversarial Attacks on Deep Neural Networks for Time Series Classificationcited by 53
4 more
- 2019Adversarial Attacks on Time Seriescited by 40
- 2021Untargeted, Targeted and Universal Adversarial Attacks and Defenses on Time Seriescited by 21
- 2022Towards an Awareness of Time Series Anomaly Detection Models' Adversarial Vulnerabilitycited by 5
- 2023On the Susceptibility and Robustness of Time Series Models through Adversarial Attack and Defensecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN) for Time Series Classification and Robust Analysiscited by 16
- 2024Understanding Why Large Language Models Can Be Ineffective in Time Series Analysis: The Impact of Modality Alignmentcited by 7
- 2024Irregularity-Informed Time Series Analysis: Adaptive Modelling of Spatial and Temporal Dynamicscited by 4
- 2024Boosting Certified Robustness for Time Series Classification with Efficient Self-Ensemblecited by 1
- 2024Correlation Analysis of Adversarial Attack in Time Series Classificationcited by 0
- 2025Lightweight Defense Against Adversarial Attacks in Time Series Classificationcited by 0
- 2025Lightweight Defense Against Adversarial Attacks in Time Series Classification4 May 2025
- 2024Understanding Why Large Language Models Can Be Ineffective in Time Series Analysis: The Impact of Modality Alignment16 Oct 2024
- 2024Irregularity-Informed Time Series Analysis: Adaptive Modelling of Spatial and Temporal Dynamics16 Oct 2024
- 2024Boosting Certified Robustness for Time Series Classification with Efficient Self-Ensemble4 Sep 2024
- 2024Correlation Analysis of Adversarial Attack in Time Series Classification21 Aug 2024
- 2024Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN) for Time Series Classification and Robust Analysis14 Aug 2024