mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards User Guided Actionable Recourse

arXiv 2309.02517 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2023cs.LG cs.CYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning's proliferation in critical fields such as healthcare, banking, and criminal justice has motivated the creation of tools which ensure trust and transparency in ML models. One such tool is Actionable Recourse (AR) for negatively impacted users. AR describes recommendations of cost-efficient changes to a user's actionable features to help them obtain favorable outcomes. Existing approaches for providing recourse optimize for properties such as proximity, sparsity, validity, and distance-based costs. However, an often-overlooked but crucial requirement for actionability is a consideration of User Preference to guide the recourse generation process. In this work, we attempt to capture user preferences via soft constraints in three simple forms: i) scoring continuous features, ii) bounding feature values and iii) ranking categorical features. Finally, we propose a gradient-based approach to identify User Preferred Actionable Recourse (UP-AR). We carried out extensive experiments to verify the effectiveness of our approach.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2023.

Builds on

19 of 38 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  5. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  6. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  7. 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 327
  8. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 232
  9. 2019Learning Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Tabular Datacited by 146
  10. 2019Preserving Causal Constraints in Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 143
  11. 2020Algorithmic recourse under imperfect causal knowledge: a probabilistic approachcited by 139
  12. 2019Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanationscited by 111
7 more
  1. 2020Getting a CLUE: A Method for Explaining Uncertainty Estimatescited by 92
  2. 2021CARLA: A Python Library to Benchmark Algorithmic Recourse and Counterfactual Explanation Algorithmscited by 85
  3. 2021Exploring Counterfactual Explanations Through the Lens of Adversarial Examples: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysiscited by 52
  4. 2017Inverse Classification for Comparison-based Interpretability in Machine Learningcited by 49
  5. 2020DECE: Decision Explorer with Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Modelscited by 38
  6. 2019Issues with post-hoc counterfactual explanations: a discussioncited by 30
  7. 2021Low-Cost Algorithmic Recourse for Users With Uncertain Cost Functionscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.