mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RDGSL: Dynamic Graph Representation Learning with Structure Learning

arXiv 2309.02025 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2023cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Temporal Graph Networks (TGNs) have shown remarkable performance in learning representation for continuous-time dynamic graphs. However, real-world dynamic graphs typically contain diverse and intricate noise. Noise can significantly degrade the quality of representation generation, impeding the effectiveness of TGNs in downstream tasks. Though structure learning is widely applied to mitigate noise in static graphs, its adaptation to dynamic graph settings poses two significant challenges. i) Noise dynamics. Existing structure learning methods are ill-equipped to address the temporal aspect of noise, hampering their effectiveness in such dynamic and ever-changing noise patterns. ii) More severe noise. Noise may be introduced along with multiple interactions between two nodes, leading to the re-pollution of these nodes and consequently causing more severe noise compared to static graphs. In this paper, we present RDGSL, a representation learning method in continuous-time dynamic graphs. Meanwhile, we propose dynamic graph structure learning, a novel supervisory signal that empowers RDGSL with the ability to effectively combat noise in dynamic graphs. To address the noise dynamics issue, we introduce the Dynamic Graph Filter, where we innovatively propose a dynamic noise function that dynamically captures both current and historical noise, enabling us to assess the temporal aspect of noise and generate a denoised graph. We further propose the Temporal Embedding Learner to tackle the challenge of more severe noise, which utilizes an attention mechanism to selectively turn a blind eye to noisy edges and hence focus on normal edges, enhancing the expressiveness for representation generation that remains resilient to noise. Our method demonstrates robustness towards downstream tasks, resulting in up to 5.1% absolute AUC improvement in evolving classification versus the second-best baseline.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2023.

Builds on

23 of 36 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  2. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
  3. 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 530
  4. 2020Inductive Representation Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 462
  5. 2019Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 448
  6. 2020Graph Structure Learning for Robust Graph Neural Networkscited by 371
  7. 2020The Pushshift Reddit Datasetcited by 292
  8. 2019Learning Discrete Structures for Graph Neural Networkscited by 231
  9. 2019Time2Vec: Learning a Vector Representation of Timecited by 213
  10. 2021D'ya like DAGs? A Survey on Structure Learning and Causal Discoverycited by 211
  11. 2022Towards Unsupervised Deep Graph Structure Learningcited by 114
  12. 2020Node Similarity Preserving Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 112
11 more
  1. 2021SLAPS: Self-Supervision Improves Structure Learning for Graph Neural Networkscited by 110
  2. 2019Masked Gradient-Based Causal Structure Learningcited by 89
  3. 2021Graph Structure Learning with Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 81
  4. 2022Towards Robust Graph Neural Networks for Noisy Graphs with Sparse Labelscited by 63
  5. 2021Dynamic Graph Neural Networks for Sequential Recommendationcited by 57
  6. 2022Provably expressive temporal graph networkscited by 56
  7. 2021Dynamic Network Embedding Surveycited by 44
  8. 2022Multi-modal Graph Learning for Disease Predictioncited by 34
  9. 2021Node Feature Kernels Increase Graph Convolutional Network Robustnesscited by 5
  10. 2020GripNet: Graph Information Propagation on Supergraph for Heterogeneous Graphscited by 4
  11. 2020Opinion Dynamics of Online Social Network Users: A Micro-Level Analysiscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 6.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: