mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

INTAGS: Interactive Agent-Guided Simulation

arXiv 2309.01784 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2023cs.LG q-fin.TR stat.APcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In many applications involving multi-agent system (MAS), it is imperative to test an experimental (Exp) autonomous agent in a high-fidelity simulator prior to its deployment to production, to avoid unexpected losses in the real-world. Such a simulator acts as the environmental background (BG) agent(s), called agent-based simulator (ABS), aiming to replicate the complex real MAS. However, developing realistic ABS remains challenging, mainly due to the sequential and dynamic nature of such systems. To fill this gap, we propose a metric to distinguish between real and synthetic multi-agent systems, which is evaluated through the live interaction between the Exp and BG agents to explicitly account for the systems' sequential nature. Specifically, we characterize the system/environment by studying the effect of a sequence of BG agents' responses to the environment state evolution and take such effects' differences as MAS distance metric; The effect estimation is cast as a causal inference problem since the environment evolution is confounded with the previous environment state. Importantly, we propose the Interactive Agent-Guided Simulation (INTAGS) framework to build a realistic ABS by optimizing over this novel metric. To adapt to any environment with interactive sequential decision making agents, INTAGS formulates the simulator as a stochastic policy in reinforcement learning. Moreover, INTAGS utilizes the policy gradient update to bypass differentiating the proposed metric such that it can support non-differentiable operations of multi-agent environments. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of INTAGS on an equity stock market simulation example. We show that using INTAGS to calibrate the simulator can generate more realistic market data compared to the state-of-the-art conditional Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network approach.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2023.

Builds on

32 of 57 references.

References · 32

  1. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  2. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  3. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,162
  4. 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,597
  5. 2017Learning Robust Rewards with Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 490
  6. 2016SeqGAN: Sequence Generative Adversarial Nets with Policy Gradientcited by 376
  7. 2021TrafficSim: Learning to Simulate Realistic Multi-Agent Behaviorscited by 193
  8. 2018Generative Adversarial Imitation from Observationcited by 184
  9. 2016A Connection between Generative Adversarial Networks, Inverse Reinforcement Learning, and Energy-Based Modelscited by 168
  10. 2021Recent Advances in Reinforcement Learning in Financecited by 110
  11. 2019Quant GANs: Deep Generation of Financial Time Seriescited by 108
  12. 2019Recent Advances in Imitation Learning from Observationcited by 93
20 more
  1. 2018Virtual-Taobao: Virtualizing Real-world Online Retail Environment for Reinforcement Learningcited by 80
  2. 2019RL-GAN-Net: A Reinforcement Learning Agent Controlled GAN Network for Real-Time Point Cloud Shape Completioncited by 58
  3. 2015On Learning to Think: Algorithmic Information Theory for Novel Combinations of Reinforcement Learning Controllers and Recurrent Neural World Modelscited by 55
  4. 2017Wasserstein Learning of Deep Generative Point Process Modelscited by 46
  5. 2018Learning To Simulatecited by 44
  6. 2019Get Real: Realism Metrics for Robust Limit Order Book Market Simulationscited by 41
  7. 2021ABIDES-Gym: Gym Environments for Multi-Agent Discrete Event Simulation and Application to Financial Marketscited by 36
  8. 2020Generating Realistic Stock Market Order Streamscited by 30
  9. 2021Towards Realistic Market Simulations: a Generative Adversarial Networks Approachcited by 29
  10. 2022Learning to simulate realistic limit order book markets from data as a World Agentcited by 27
  11. 2018Learning from Demonstration in the Wildcited by 25
  12. 2020Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for Efficient and Effective GAN Architecture Searchcited by 25
  13. 2019Simulating Emergent Properties of Human Driving Behavior Using Multi-Agent Reward Augmented Imitation Learningcited by 24
  14. 2019Generative Adversarial Networks for Financial Trading Strategies Fine-Tuning and Combinationcited by 22
  15. 2019How to Evaluate Trading Strategies: Single Agent Market Replay or Multiple Agent Interactive Simulation?cited by 15
  16. 2023Conditional Generators for Limit Order Book Environments: Explainability, Challenges, and Robustnesscited by 14
  17. 2018Optimizing Market Making using Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  18. 2023Neural Stochastic Agent-Based Limit Order Book Simulation: A Hybrid Methodologycited by 11
  19. 2018eCommerceGAN : A Generative Adversarial Network for E-commercecited by 5
  20. 2021Learning who is in the market from time series: market participant discovery through adversarial calibration of multi-agent simulatorscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.