mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Let the Models Respond: Interpreting Language Model Detoxification Through the Lens of Prompt Dependence

arXiv 2309.00751 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2023cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to language models' propensity to generate toxic or hateful responses, several techniques were developed to align model generations with users' preferences. Despite the effectiveness of such methods in improving the safety of model interactions, their impact on models' internal processes is still poorly understood. In this work, we apply popular detoxification approaches to several language models and quantify their impact on the resulting models' prompt dependence using feature attribution methods. We evaluate the effectiveness of counter-narrative fine-tuning and compare it with reinforcement learning-driven detoxification, observing differences in prompt reliance between the two methods despite their similar detoxification performances.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2023.

Builds on

25 of 30 references.

References · 25

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  4. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  5. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  6. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  7. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  8. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
  9. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
  10. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  11. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
  12. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
13 more
  1. 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 527
  2. 2023XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 477
  3. 2023Pretraining Language Models with Human Preferencescited by 245
  4. 2020Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detectioncited by 217
  5. 2021Process for Adapting Language Models to Society (PALMS) with Values-Targeted Datasetscited by 179
  6. 2019CONAN -- COunter NArratives through Nichesourcing: a Multilingual Dataset of Responses to Fight Online Hate Speechcited by 109
  7. 2023Inseq: An Interpretability Toolkit for Sequence Generation Modelscited by 78
  8. 2020Analyzing the Source and Target Contributions to Predictions in Neural Machine Translationcited by 71
  9. 2022Entropy-based Attention Regularization Frees Unintended Bias Mitigation from Listscited by 54
  10. 2022Towards Opening the Black Box of Neural Machine Translation: Source and Target Interpretations of the Transformercited by 45
  11. 2023Explaining How Transformers Use Context to Build Predictionscited by 42
  12. 2022Human-Machine Collaboration Approaches to Build a Dialogue Dataset for Hate Speech Counteringcited by 40
  13. 2022Using Pre-Trained Language Models for Producing Counter Narratives Against Hate Speech: a Comparative Studycited by 30

Built on by

Not cited yet.