mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Group-Conditional Conformal Prediction via Quantile Regression Calibration for Crop and Weed Classification

arXiv 2308.15094 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2023cs.CV cs.LG stat.APcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As deep learning predictive models become an integral part of a large spectrum of precision agricultural systems, a barrier to the adoption of such automated solutions is the lack of user trust in these highly complex, opaque and uncertain models. Indeed, deep neural networks are not equipped with any explicit guarantees that can be used to certify the system's performance, especially in highly varying uncontrolled environments such as the ones typically faced in computer vision for agriculture.Fortunately, certain methods developed in other communities can prove to be important for agricultural applications. This article presents the conformal prediction framework that provides valid statistical guarantees on the predictive performance of any black box prediction machine, with almost no assumptions, applied to the problem of deep visual classification of weeds and crops in real-world conditions. The framework is exposed with a focus on its practical aspects and special attention accorded to the Adaptive Prediction Sets (APS) approach that delivers marginal guarantees on the model's coverage. Marginal results are then shown to be insufficient to guarantee performance on all groups of individuals in the population as characterized by their environmental and pedo-climatic auxiliary data gathered during image acquisition.To tackle this shortcoming, group-conditional conformal approaches are presented: the ''classical'' method that consists of iteratively applying the APS procedure on all groups, and a proposed elegant reformulation and implementation of the procedure using quantile regression on group membership indicators. Empirical results showing the validity of the proposed approach are presented and compared to the marginal APS then discussed.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2023.

Builds on

13 of 31 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  5. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  6. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
  7. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
  8. 2020Classification with Valid and Adaptive Coveragecited by 396
  9. 2020Uncertainty Sets for Image Classifiers using Conformal Predictioncited by 366
  10. 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
  11. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 149
  12. 2021Out of Distribution Generalization in Machine Learningcited by 60
1 more
  1. 2019With Malice Towards None: Assessing Uncertainty via Equalized Coveragecited by 43

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

9 papers.