mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How to Evaluate the Generalization of Detection? A Benchmark for Comprehensive Open-Vocabulary Detection

arXiv 2308.13177 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2023cs.CV cs.CLcited by 15

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Driving VLMs and open-vocabulary detection

Abstract (arXiv)

Object detection (OD) in computer vision has made significant progress in recent years, transitioning from closed-set labels to open-vocabulary detection (OVD) based on large-scale vision-language pre-training (VLP). However, current evaluation methods and datasets are limited to testing generalization over object types and referral expressions, which do not provide a systematic, fine-grained, and accurate benchmark of OVD models' abilities. In this paper, we propose a new benchmark named OVDEval, which includes 9 sub-tasks and introduces evaluations on commonsense knowledge, attribute understanding, position understanding, object relation comprehension, and more. The dataset is meticulously created to provide hard negatives that challenge models' true understanding of visual and linguistic input. Additionally, we identify a problem with the popular Average Precision (AP) metric when benchmarking models on these fine-grained label datasets and propose a new metric called Non-Maximum Suppression Average Precision (NMS-AP) to address this issue. Extensive experimental results show that existing top OVD models all fail on the new tasks except for simple object types, demonstrating the value of the proposed dataset in pinpointing the weakness of current OVD models and guiding future research. Furthermore, the proposed NMS-AP metric is verified by experiments to provide a much more truthful evaluation of OVD models, whereas traditional AP metrics yield deceptive results. Data is available at urlhttps://github.com/om-ai-lab/OVDEval

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Driving VLMs and open-vocabulary detection, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 30 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2023.

Builds on

30 of 34 references.

References · 30

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  4. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  5. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
  6. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
  7. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
  8. 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,555
  9. 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,362
  10. 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,319
  11. 2019LVIS: A Dataset for Large Vocabulary Instance Segmentationcited by 1,217
  12. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,214
18 more
  1. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,190
  2. 2021Grounded Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 1,156
  3. 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,063
  4. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  5. 2021MDETR -- Modulated Detection for End-to-End Multi-Modal Understandingcited by 819
  6. 2022Detecting Twenty-thousand Classes using Image-level Supervisioncited by 614
  7. 2023Otter: A Multi-Modal Model with In-Context Instruction Tuningcited by 550
  8. 2022LM-Nav: Robotic Navigation with Large Pre-Trained Models of Language, Vision, and Actioncited by 439
  9. 2017Learning to Detect Human-Object Interactionscited by 240
  10. 2019PPDM: Parallel Point Detection and Matching for Real-time Human-Object Interaction Detectioncited by 143
  11. 2022ELEVATER: A Benchmark and Toolkit for Evaluating Language-Augmented Visual Modelscited by 141
  12. 2020PhraseCut: Language-based Image Segmentation in the Wildcited by 116
  13. 2022VL-CheckList: Evaluating Pre-trained Vision-Language Models with Objects, Attributes and Relationscited by 114
  14. 2022Coarse-to-Fine Vision-Language Pre-training with Fusion in the Backbonecited by 109
  15. 2021Learning to Predict Visual Attributes in the Wildcited by 96
  16. 2023V3Det: Vast Vocabulary Visual Detection Datasetcited by 81
  17. 2022X-DETR: A Versatile Architecture for Instance-wise Vision-Language Taskscited by 43
  18. 2022Vision Checklist: Towards Testable Error Analysis of Image Models to Help System Designers Interrogate Model Capabilitiescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 8; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ODOV: Benchmark the Open-Domain Open-Vocabulary Object Detection
  2. 2023A Survey on Open-Vocabulary Detection and Segmentation: Past, Present, and Future
  3. 2026Exploring Hierarchical Consistency and Unbiased Objectness for Open-Vocabulary Object Detection
  4. 2025Vision-Language Model for Object Detection and Segmentation: A Review and Evaluation
  5. 2023What Makes Good Open-Vocabulary Detector: A Disassembling Perspective
  6. 2022Open-vocabulary Attribute Detection
  7. 2025COUNTS: Benchmarking Object Detectors and Multimodal Large Language Models under Distribution Shifts
  8. 2024Learning Background Prompts to Discover Implicit Knowledge for Open Vocabulary Object Detection