mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

"Guinea Pig Trials" Utilizing GPT: A Novel Smart Agent-Based Modeling Approach for Studying Firm Competition and Collusion

arXiv 2308.10974 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2023cs.AI cs.CE cs.CLcited by 13

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Firm competition and collusion involve complex dynamics, particularly when considering communication among firms. Such issues can be modeled as problems of complex systems, traditionally approached through experiments involving human subjects or agent-based modeling methods. We propose an innovative framework called Smart Agent-Based Modeling (SABM), wherein smart agents, supported by GPT-4 technologies, represent firms, and interact with one another. We conducted a controlled experiment to study firm price competition and collusion behaviors under various conditions. SABM is more cost-effective and flexible compared to conducting experiments with human subjects. Smart agents possess an extensive knowledge base for decision-making and exhibit human-like strategic abilities, surpassing traditional ABM agents. Furthermore, smart agents can simulate human conversation and be personalized, making them ideal for studying complex situations involving communication. Our results demonstrate that, in the absence of communication, smart agents consistently reach tacit collusion, leading to prices converging at levels higher than the Bertrand equilibrium price but lower than monopoly or cartel prices. When communication is allowed, smart agents achieve a higher-level collusion with prices close to cartel prices. Collusion forms more quickly with communication, while price convergence is smoother without it. These results indicate that communication enhances trust between firms, encouraging frequent small price deviations to explore opportunities for a higher-level win-win situation and reducing the likelihood of triggering a price war. We also assigned different personas to firms to analyze behavioral differences and tested variant models under diverse market structures. The findings showcase the effectiveness and robustness of SABM and provide intriguing insights into competition and collusion.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2023.

Builds on

4 of 15 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  3. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  4. 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 389

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Position: Collusion Risks Among AI Reasoning Agents Justify Certification Requirements for Making Market Decisions
  2. 2024Strategic Collusion of LLM Agents: Market Division in Multi-Commodity Competitions
  3. 2026Prompt Optimization Enables Stable Algorithmic Collusion in LLM Agents
  4. 2026Strategic Exploitation in LLM Agent Markets: A Simulation Framework for E-Commerce Trust
  5. 2026Faithful yet Collusive: Why Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Cannot Detect Collusion in LLM Pricing Agents under Oligopolistic Competition
  6. 2026On the Fragility of AI Agent Collusion
  7. 2025Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions
  8. 2026Cattle Trade: A Multi-Agent Benchmark for LLM Bluffing, Bidding, and Bargaining