mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions

arXiv 2507.01413 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2025cs.GT cs.AI cs.LGcited by 11

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities as autonomous agents with rapidly expanding applications in various domains. As these agents increasingly engage in socioeconomic interactions, identifying their potential for undesirable behavior becomes essential. In this work, we examine scenarios where they can choose to collude, defined as secretive cooperation that harms another party. To systematically study this, we investigate the behavior of LLM agents acting as sellers in simulated continuous double auction markets. Through a series of controlled experiments, we analyze how parameters such as the ability to communicate, choice of model, and presence of environmental pressures affect the stability and emergence of seller collusion. We find that direct seller communication increases collusive tendencies, the propensity to collude varies across models, and environmental pressures, such as oversight and urgency from authority figures, influence collusive behavior. Our findings highlight important economic and ethical considerations for the deployment of LLM-based market agents.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2025.

Builds on

11 of 49 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Strategic Collusion of LLM Agents: Market Division in Multi-Commodity Competitions19 Sep

Other references · 10

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  2. 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,197
  3. 2024Judging the Judges: Evaluating Alignment and Vulnerabilities in LLMs-as-Judgescited by 197
  4. 2025Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AIcited by 150
  5. 2025The MASK Benchmark: Disentangling Honesty From Accuracy in AI Systemscited by 57
  6. 2024Hidden in Plain Text: Emergence & Mitigation of Steganographic Collusion in LLMscited by 52
  7. 2024Shall We Team Up: Exploring Spontaneous Cooperation of Competing LLM Agentscited by 48
  8. 2024AI-AI Bias: large language models favor communications generated by large language modelscited by 25
  9. 2025An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge: How Design Choices Impact Evaluation Reliabilitycited by 17
  10. 2025Potential and Perils of Large Language Models as Judges of Unstructured Textual Datacited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 8.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Competitive Market Behavior of LLMs
  2. 2025Understanding LLM Agent Behaviours via Game Theory: Strategy Recognition, Biases and Multi-Agent Dynamics
  3. 2025InfoBid: A Simulation Framework for Studying Information Disclosure in Auctions with Large Language Model-based Agents
  4. 2026LLM Consumer Behavior Theory: Foundations of a Novel Research Field
  5. 2026Prompt Optimization Enables Stable Algorithmic Collusion in LLM Agents
  6. 2026Faithful yet Collusive: Why Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Cannot Detect Collusion in LLM Pricing Agents under Oligopolistic Competition
  7. 2026Emergent Collusion in Long-Horizon LLM Agent Interaction
  8. 2025LLM Bidders Preserve the Mechanism-Level Orderings of Human Bidders