mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

BAN-PL: a Novel Polish Dataset of Banned Harmful and Offensive Content from Wykop.pl web service

arXiv 2308.10592 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2023cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Since the Internet is flooded with hate, it is one of the main tasks for NLP experts to master automated online content moderation. However, advancements in this field require improved access to publicly available accurate and non-synthetic datasets of social media content. For the Polish language, such resources are very limited. In this paper, we address this gap by presenting a new open dataset of offensive social media content for the Polish language. The dataset comprises content from Wykop.pl, a popular online service often referred to as the "Polish Reddit", reported by users and banned in the internal moderation process. It contains a total of 691,662 posts and comments, evenly divided into two categories: "harmful" and "neutral" ("non-harmful"). The anonymized subset of the BAN-PL dataset consisting on 24,000 pieces (12,000 for each class), along with preprocessing scripts have been made publicly available. Furthermore the paper offers valuable insights into real-life content moderation processes and delves into an analysis of linguistic features and content characteristics of the dataset. Moreover, a comprehensive anonymization procedure has been meticulously described and applied. The prevalent biases encountered in similar datasets, including post-moderation and pre-selection biases, are also discussed.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2023.

Builds on

20 of 85 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  2. 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 414
  3. 2019Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Mediacited by 268
  4. 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 265
  5. 2021Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detectioncited by 258
  6. 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 208
  7. 2019SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval)cited by 206
  8. 2020HateBERT: Retraining BERT for Abusive Language Detection in Englishcited by 206
  9. 2021MultiVerS: Improving scientific claim verification with weak supervision and full-document contextcited by 140
  10. 2020Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Outcited by 139
  11. 2019A Benchmark Dataset for Learning to Intervene in Online Hate Speechcited by 128
  12. 2017Measuring the Reliability of Hate Speech Annotations: The Case of the European Refugee Crisiscited by 95
8 more
  1. 2021Towards generalisable hate speech detection: a review on obstacles and solutionscited by 66
  2. 2022Handling Bias in Toxic Speech Detection: A Surveycited by 60
  3. 2018All You Need is "Love": Evading Hate-speech Detectioncited by 56
  4. 2020KLEJ: Comprehensive Benchmark for Polish Language Understandingcited by 51
  5. 2020Pre-training Polish Transformer-based Language Models at Scalecited by 21
  6. 2021The Origin and Value of Disagreement Among Data Labelers: A Case Study of the Individual Difference in Hate Speech Annotationcited by 15
  7. 2022APEACH: Attacking Pejorative Expressions with Analysis on Crowd-Generated Hate Speech Evaluation Datasetscited by 8
  8. 2019Current Limitations in Cyberbullying Detection: on Evaluation Criteria, Reproducibility, and Data Scarcitycited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

6 papers.