mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generative Adversarial Networks Unlearning

arXiv 2308.09881 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2023cs.LG cs.CRcited by 11

On the map: LLM safety and security → Vision-language and text-to-image safety

Abstract (arXiv)

As machine learning continues to develop, and data misuse scandals become more prevalent, individuals are becoming increasingly concerned about their personal information and are advocating for the right to remove their data. Machine unlearning has emerged as a solution to erase training data from trained machine learning models. Despite its success in classifiers, research on Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) is limited due to their unique architecture, including a generator and a discriminator. One challenge pertains to generator unlearning, as the process could potentially disrupt the continuity and completeness of the latent space. This disruption might consequently diminish the model's effectiveness after unlearning. Another challenge is how to define a criterion that the discriminator should perform for the unlearning images. In this paper, we introduce a substitution mechanism and define a fake label to effectively mitigate these challenges. Based on the substitution mechanism and fake label, we propose a cascaded unlearning approach for both item and class unlearning within GAN models, in which the unlearning and learning processes run in a cascaded manner. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the cascaded unlearning technique using the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that this approach achieves significantly improved item and class unlearning efficiency, reducing the required time by up to 185x and 284x for the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets, respectively, in comparison to retraining from scratch. Notably, although the model's performance experiences minor degradation after unlearning, this reduction is negligible when dealing with a minimal number of images (e.g., 64) and has no adverse effects on downstream tasks such as classification.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Vision-language and text-to-image safety, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 39 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2023.

Builds on

39 of 70 references.

References · 39

  1. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  2. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
  3. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
  4. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  5. 2020Training Generative Adversarial Networks with Limited Datacited by 1,186
  6. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
  7. 2016Least Squares Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,001
  8. 2019Interpreting the Latent Space of GANs for Semantic Face Editingcited by 695
  9. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 535
  10. 2020In-Domain GAN Inversion for Real Image Editingcited by 420
  11. 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearningcited by 371
  12. 2021GAN Inversion: A Surveycited by 367
27 more
  1. 2016Generative Visual Manipulation on the Natural Image Manifoldcited by 348
  2. 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 321
  3. 2020Amnesiac Machine Learningcited by 319
  4. 2022A Survey of Machine Unlearningcited by 312
  5. 2020Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearningcited by 311
  6. 2020Unsupervised Discovery of Interpretable Directions in the GAN Latent Spacecited by 289
  7. 2021Unrolling SGD: Understanding Factors Influencing Machine Unlearningcited by 279
  8. 2018GAN-based Synthetic Medical Image Augmentation for increased CNN Performance in Liver Lesion Classificationcited by 242
  9. 2021Machine Unlearning of Features and Labelscited by 229
  10. 2021Fast Yet Effective Machine Unlearningcited by 217
  11. 2023Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine Unlearningcited by 214
  12. 2020When Machine Unlearning Jeopardizes Privacycited by 198
  13. 2023Fast Machine Unlearning Without Retraining Through Selective Synaptic Dampeningcited by 181
  14. 2023Boundary Unlearningcited by 134
  15. 2022Zero-Shot Machine Unlearningcited by 133
  16. 2019Zero-shot Knowledge Transfer via Adversarial Belief Matchingcited by 129
  17. 2019Reconstruction and Membership Inference Attacks against Generative Modelscited by 122
  18. 2016Invertible Conditional GANs for image editingcited by 118
  19. 2020Machine Unlearning: Linear Filtration for Logit-based Classifierscited by 95
  20. 2020Learn to Forget: Machine Unlearning via Neuron Maskingcited by 62
  21. 2018A Spectral Regularizer for Unsupervised Disentanglementcited by 30
  22. 2021SSSE: Efficiently Erasing Samples from Trained Machine Learning Modelscited by 28
  23. 2018Performing Co-Membership Attacks Against Deep Generative Modelscited by 26
  24. 2021Adversarial Attacks Against Deep Generative Models on Data: A Surveycited by 24
  25. 2022Few-Shot Unlearning by Model Inversioncited by 19
  26. 2021Disentangled Face Attribute Editing via Instance-Aware Latent Space Searchcited by 12
  27. 2021Machine unlearning via GANcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Machine Unlearning using a Multi-GAN based Model
  2. 2025Prompting Forgetting: Unlearning in GANs via Textual Guidance
  3. 2025Adversarial Mixup Unlearning
  4. 2023Feature Unlearning for Pre-trained GANs and VAEs
  5. 2024Unlearn and Burn: Adversarial Machine Unlearning Requests Destroy Model Accuracy
  6. 2025Layered Unlearning for Adversarial Relearning
  7. 2024Defensive Unlearning with Adversarial Training for Robust Concept Erasure in Diffusion Models
  8. 2024Adversarial Machine Unlearning