mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On Data Imbalance in Molecular Property Prediction with Pre-training

arXiv 2308.08934 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2023cs.LG cond-mat.mtrl-scicited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Revealing and analyzing the various properties of materials is an essential and critical issue in the development of materials, including batteries, semiconductors, catalysts, and pharmaceuticals. Traditionally, these properties have been determined through theoretical calculations and simulations. However, it is not practical to perform such calculations on every single candidate material. Recently, a combination method of the theoretical calculation and machine learning has emerged, that involves training machine learning models on a subset of theoretical calculation results to construct a surrogate model that can be applied to the remaining materials. On the other hand, a technique called pre-training is used to improve the accuracy of machine learning models. Pre-training involves training the model on pretext task, which is different from the target task, before training the model on the target task. This process aims to extract the input data features, stabilizing the learning process and improving its accuracy. However, in the case of molecular property prediction, there is a strong imbalance in the distribution of input data and features, which may lead to biased learning towards frequently occurring data during pre-training. In this study, we propose an effective pre-training method that addresses the imbalance in input data. We aim to improve the final accuracy by modifying the loss function of the existing representative pre-training method, node masking, to compensate the imbalance. We have investigated and assessed the impact of our proposed imbalance compensation on pre-training and the final prediction accuracy through experiments and evaluations using benchmark of molecular property prediction models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2023.

Builds on

20 of 32 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  5. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  6. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
  7. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 989
  8. 2019Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networkscited by 971
  9. 2021OGB-LSC: A Large-Scale Challenge for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 329
  10. 2021Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation?cited by 320
  11. 2021Pre-training Molecular Graph Representation with 3D Geometrycited by 248
  12. 2021Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Littlecited by 177
8 more
  1. 2021Delving into Deep Imbalanced Regressioncited by 158
  2. 2022The Open Catalyst 2022 (OC22) Dataset and Challenges for Oxide Electrocatalystscited by 95
  3. 2018Deep Imbalanced Learning for Face Recognition and Attribute Predictioncited by 91
  4. 2017On Loss Functions for Deep Neural Networks in Classificationcited by 68
  5. 2022Does GNN Pretraining Help Molecular Representation?cited by 60
  6. 2019Recent Advances in Deep Learning for Object Detectioncited by 50
  7. 2022Unified 2D and 3D Pre-Training of Molecular Representationscited by 45
  8. 2020Resolving Class Imbalance in Object Detection with Weighted Cross Entropy Lossescited by 21

Built on by

Not cited yet.