mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DeepContrast: Deep Tissue Contrast Enhancement using Synthetic Data Degradations and OOD Model Predictions

arXiv 2308.08365 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2023eess.IV cs.CV q-bio.TOcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Microscopy images are crucial for life science research, allowing detailed inspection and characterization of cellular and tissue-level structures and functions. However, microscopy data are unavoidably affected by image degradations, such as noise, blur, or others. Many such degradations also contribute to a loss of image contrast, which becomes especially pronounced in deeper regions of thick samples. Today, best performing methods to increase the quality of images are based on Deep Learning approaches, which typically require ground truth (GT) data during training. Our inability to counteract blurring and contrast loss when imaging deep into samples prevents the acquisition of such clean GT data. The fact that the forward process of blurring and contrast loss deep into tissue can be modeled, allowed us to propose a new method that can circumvent the problem of unobtainable GT data. To this end, we first synthetically degraded the quality of microscopy images even further by using an approximate forward model for deep tissue image degradations. Then we trained a neural network that learned the inverse of this degradation function from our generated pairs of raw and degraded images. We demonstrated that networks trained in this way can be used out-of-distribution (OOD) to improve the quality of less severely degraded images, e.g. the raw data imaged in a microscope. Since the absolute level of degradation in such microscopy images can be stronger than the additional degradation introduced by our forward model, we also explored the effect of iterative predictions. Here, we observed that in each iteration the measured image contrast kept improving while detailed structures in the images got increasingly removed. Therefore, dependent on the desired downstream analysis, a balance between contrast improvement and retention of image details has to be found.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2023.

Builds on

9 of 35 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2018Image Super-Resolution Using Very Deep Residual Channel Attention Networkscited by 1,256
  3. 2018Residual Dense Network for Image Super-Resolutioncited by 796
  4. 2018Noise2Void - Learning Denoising from Single Noisy Imagescited by 359
  5. 2019Noise2Self: Blind Denoising by Self-Supervisioncited by 274
  6. 2019Robust and interpretable blind image denoising via bias-free convolutional neural networkscited by 87
  7. 2021Interpretable Unsupervised Diversity Denoising and Artefact Removalcited by 26
  8. 2017Isotropic reconstruction of 3D fluorescence microscopy images using convolutional neural networkscited by 17
  9. 2020Improving Blind Spot Denoising for Microscopycited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.