mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Using Artificial Populations to Study Psychological Phenomena in Neural Models

arXiv 2308.08032 ↗First posted 15 Aug 2023cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The recent proliferation of research into transformer based natural language processing has led to a number of studies which attempt to detect the presence of human-like cognitive behavior in the models. We contend that, as is true of human psychology, the investigation of cognitive behavior in language models must be conducted in an appropriate population of an appropriate size for the results to be meaningful. We leverage work in uncertainty estimation in a novel approach to efficiently construct experimental populations. The resultant tool, PopulationLM, has been made open source. We provide theoretical grounding in the uncertainty estimation literature and motivation from current cognitive work regarding language models. We discuss the methodological lessons from other scientific communities and attempt to demonstrate their application to two artificial population studies. Through population based experimentation we find that language models exhibit behavior consistent with typicality effects among categories highly represented in training. However, we find that language models don't tend to exhibit structural priming effects. Generally, our results show that single models tend to over estimate the presence of cognitive behaviors in neural models.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2023.

Builds on

25 of 37 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  5. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  6. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  7. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  8. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  9. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  10. 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  11. 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 612
  12. 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 389
13 more
  1. 2023Large Language Models Fail on Trivial Alterations to Theory-of-Mind Taskscited by 288
  2. 2019Theoretical Limitations of Self-Attention in Neural Sequence Modelscited by 286
  3. 2022Neural Theory-of-Mind? On the Limits of Social Intelligence in Large LMscited by 220
  4. 2020The Cost of Training NLP Models: A Concise Overviewcited by 97
  5. 2022Capturing Failures of Large Language Models via Human Cognitive Biasescited by 97
  6. 2020Greedy Policy Search: A Simple Baseline for Learnable Test-Time Augmentationcited by 61
  7. 2022Do Large Language Models know what humans know?cited by 60
  8. 2022Problems with Cosine as a Measure of Embedding Similarity for High Frequency Wordscited by 49
  9. 2021Structural Persistence in Language Models: Priming as a Window into Abstract Language Representationscited by 44
  10. 2023Do Large Language Models Show Decision Heuristics Similar to Humans? A Case Study Using GPT-3.5cited by 41
  11. 2021Do language models learn typicality judgments from text?cited by 32
  12. 2023LLM Cognitive Judgements Differ From Humancited by 8
  13. 2020Reinforcement Learning and its Connections with Neuroscience and Psychologycited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 4.

8 papers.