mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Thresh: A Unified, Customizable and Deployable Platform for Fine-Grained Text Evaluation

arXiv 2308.06953 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2023cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-grained, span-level human evaluation has emerged as a reliable and robust method for evaluating text generation tasks such as summarization, simplification, machine translation and news generation, and the derived annotations have been useful for training automatic metrics and improving language models. However, existing annotation tools implemented for these evaluation frameworks lack the adaptability to be extended to different domains or languages, or modify annotation settings according to user needs; and, the absence of a unified annotated data format inhibits the research in multi-task learning. In this paper, we introduce Thresh, a unified, customizable and deployable platform for fine-grained evaluation. With a single YAML configuration file, users can build and test an annotation interface for any framework within minutes -- all in one web browser window. To facilitate collaboration and sharing, Thresh provides a community hub that hosts a collection of fine-grained frameworks and corresponding annotations made and collected by the community, covering a wide range of NLP tasks. For deployment, Thresh offers multiple options for any scale of annotation projects from small manual inspections to large crowdsourcing ones. Additionally, we introduce a Python library to streamline the entire process from typology design and deployment to annotation processing. Thresh is publicly accessible at https://thresh.tools.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2023.

Builds on

25 of 40 references.

References · 25

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  4. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  5. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  6. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,470
  7. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,049
  8. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
  9. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 401
  10. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
  11. 2021Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metricscited by 287
  12. 2021All That's 'Human' Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Textcited by 287
13 more
  1. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Propaganda in News Articlescited by 133
  2. 2023Artificial Artificial Artificial Intelligence: Crowd Workers Widely Use Large Language Models for Text Production Taskscited by 103
  3. 2021The Perils of Using Mechanical Turk to Evaluate Open-Ended Text Generationcited by 97
  4. 2021Is GPT-3 Text Indistinguishable from Human Text? Scarecrow: A Framework for Scrutinizing Machine Textcited by 89
  5. 2022POTATO: The Portable Text Annotation Toolcited by 64
  6. 2022LENS: A Learnable Evaluation Metric for Text Simplificationcited by 54
  7. 2021Beyond Fair Pay: Ethical Implications of NLP Crowdsourcingcited by 53
  8. 2022arXivEdits: Understanding the Human Revision Process in Scientific Writingcited by 26
  9. 2022SNaC: Coherence Error Detection for Narrative Summarizationcited by 19
  10. 2021Neural semi-Markov CRF for Monolingual Word Alignmentcited by 16
  11. 2021LightTag: Text Annotation Platformcited by 16
  12. 2023Dancing Between Success and Failure: Edit-level Simplification Evaluation using SALSAcited by 15
  13. 2022Improving Large-scale Paraphrase Acquisition and Generationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.