Insurance pricing on price comparison websites via reinforcement learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The emergence of price comparison websites (PCWs) has presented insurers with unique challenges in formulating effective pricing strategies. Operating on PCWs requires insurers to strike a delicate balance between competitive premiums and profitability, amidst obstacles such as low historical conversion rates, limited visibility of competitors' actions, and a dynamic market environment. In addition to this, the capital intensive nature of the business means pricing below the risk levels of customers can result in solvency issues for the insurer. To address these challenges, this paper introduces reinforcement learning (RL) framework that learns the optimal pricing policy by integrating model-based and model-free methods. The model-based component is used to train agents in an offline setting, avoiding cold-start issues, while model-free algorithms are then employed in a contextual bandit (CB) manner to dynamically update the pricing policy to maximise the expected revenue. This facilitates quick adaptation to evolving market dynamics and enhances algorithm efficiency and decision interpretability. The paper also highlights the importance of evaluating pricing policies using an offline dataset in a consistent fashion and demonstrates the superiority of the proposed methodology over existing off-the-shelf RL/CB approaches. We validate our methodology using synthetic data, generated to reflect private commercially available data within real-world insurers, and compare against 6 other benchmark approaches. Our hybrid agent outperforms these benchmarks in terms of sample efficiency and cumulative reward with the exception of an agent that has access to perfect market information which would not be available in a real-world set-up.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2023.
Builds on
16 of 33 references.
References · 16
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,241
- 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overviewcited by 333
- 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 256
- 2022A Survey on Offline Reinforcement Learning: Taxonomy, Review, and Open Problemscited by 231
- 2019A Generalized Algorithm for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Policy Adaptationcited by 177
- 2017Real-Time Bidding by Reinforcement Learning in Display Advertisingcited by 91
- 2021Distribution-free Contextual Dynamic Pricingcited by 22
- 2018Deep Contextual Multi-armed Banditscited by 16
4 more
- 2021MACEst: The reliable and trustworthy Model Agnostic Confidence Estimatorcited by 3
- 2022Offline Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Pricing of Consumer Creditcited by 3
- 2021Customer Price Sensitivities in Competitive Automobile Insurance Marketscited by 2
- 2021Bid Optimization using Maximum Entropy Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.