mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MACEst: The reliable and trustworthy Model Agnostic Confidence Estimator

arXiv 2109.01531 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2021cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable Confidence Estimates are hugely important for any machine learning model to be truly useful. In this paper, we argue that any confidence estimates based upon standard machine learning point prediction algorithms are fundamentally flawed and under situations with a large amount of epistemic uncertainty are likely to be untrustworthy. To address these issues, we present MACEst, a Model Agnostic Confidence Estimator, which provides reliable and trustworthy confidence estimates. The algorithm differs from current methods by estimating confidence independently as a local quantity which explicitly accounts for both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. This approach differs from standard calibration methods that use a global point prediction model as a starting point for the confidence estimate.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2021.

Builds on

15 of 37 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  4. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  5. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  6. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  7. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
  8. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  9. 2016Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using Hierarchical Navigable Small World graphscited by 853
  10. 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 443
  11. 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 364
  12. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
3 more
  1. 2018To Trust Or Not To Trust A Classifiercited by 205
  2. 2018ANN-Benchmarks: A Benchmarking Tool for Approximate Nearest Neighbor Algorithmscited by 130
  3. 2019FiBiNET: Combining Feature Importance and Bilinear feature Interaction for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 83

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.