mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Optimizing Algorithms From Pairwise User Preferences

arXiv 2308.04571 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2023cs.RO cs.CV cs.HCcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Typical black-box optimization approaches in robotics focus on learning from metric scores. However, that is not always possible, as not all developers have ground truth available. Learning appropriate robot behavior in human-centric contexts often requires querying users, who typically cannot provide precise metric scores. Existing approaches leverage human feedback in an attempt to model an implicit reward function; however, this reward may be difficult or impossible to effectively capture. In this work, we introduce SortCMA to optimize algorithm parameter configurations in high dimensions based on pairwise user preferences. SortCMA efficiently and robustly leverages user input to find parameter sets without directly modeling a reward. We apply this method to tuning a commercial depth sensor without ground truth, and to robot social navigation, which involves highly complex preferences over robot behavior. We show that our method succeeds in optimizing for the user's goals and perform a user study to evaluate social navigation results.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2023.

Builds on

19 of 40 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorialcited by 377
  2. 2016COCO: A Platform for Comparing Continuous Optimizers in a Black-Box Settingcited by 138
  3. 2021Core Challenges of Social Robot Navigation: A Surveycited by 106
  4. 2017Intel RealSense Stereoscopic Depth Camerascited by 83
  5. 2013A Literature Survey of Benchmark Functions For Global Optimization Problemscited by 77
  6. 2020Federated Bayesian Optimization via Thompson Samplingcited by 77
  7. 2017Preferential Bayesian Optimizationcited by 74
  8. 2020Active Preference-Based Gaussian Process Regression for Reward Learningcited by 71
  9. 2022Preference Exploration for Efficient Bayesian Optimization with Multiple Outcomescited by 42
  10. 2023Zeroth-Order Optimization Meets Human Feedback: Provable Learning via Ranking Oraclescited by 35
  11. 2021SocNavBench: A Grounded Simulation Testing Framework for Evaluating Social Navigationcited by 24
  12. 2020Preferential Batch Bayesian Optimizationcited by 19
7 more
  1. 2021APReL: A Library for Active Preference-based Reward Learning Algorithmscited by 14
  2. 2021A Federated Data-Driven Evolutionary Algorithmcited by 8
  3. 2023Optimal Bounds for Noisy Sortingcited by 8
  4. 2021Learning How to Optimize Black-Box Functions With Extreme Limits on the Number of Function Evaluationscited by 5
  5. 2020Customized Handling of Unintended Interface Operation in Assistive Robotscited by 3
  6. 2022Distributed Evolution Strategies for Black-box Stochastic Optimizationcited by 1
  7. 2023Discovering Multiple Algorithm Configurationscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

4 papers.