mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Unsynchronized Decentralized Q-Learning: Two Timescale Analysis By Persistence

arXiv 2308.03239 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2023cs.GT cs.LG cs.MAcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Non-stationarity is a fundamental challenge in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), where agents update their behaviour as they learn. Many theoretical advances in MARL avoid the challenge of non-stationarity by coordinating the policy updates of agents in various ways, including synchronizing times at which agents are allowed to revise their policies. Synchronization enables analysis of many MARL algorithms via multi-timescale methods, but such synchronization is infeasible in many decentralized applications. In this paper, we study an unsynchronized variant of the decentralized Q-learning algorithm, a recent MARL algorithm for stochastic games. We provide sufficient conditions under which the unsynchronized algorithm drives play to equilibrium with high probability. Our solution utilizes constant learning rates in the Q-factor update, which we show to be critical for relaxing the synchronization assumptions of earlier work. Our analysis also applies to unsynchronized generalizations of a number of other algorithms from the regret testing tradition, whose performance is analyzed by multi-timescale methods that study Markov chains obtained via policy update dynamics. This work extends the applicability of the decentralized Q-learning algorithm and its relatives to settings in which parameters are selected in an independent manner, and tames non-stationarity without imposing the coordination assumptions of prior work.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2023.

Builds on

14 of 39 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018A Survey and Critique of Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 173
  2. 2017Cycles in adversarial regularized learningcited by 122
  3. 2021Independent Policy Gradient Methods for Competitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 97
  4. 2017A Survey of Learning in Multiagent Environments: Dealing with Non-Stationaritycited by 93
  5. 2021Global Convergence of Multi-Agent Policy Gradient in Markov Potential Gamescited by 89
  6. 2021Decentralized Q-Learning in Zero-sum Markov Gamescited by 53
  7. 2015Decentralized Q-Learning for Stochastic Teams and Gamescited by 34
  8. 2021Learning in Nonzero-Sum Stochastic Games with Potentialscited by 25
  9. 2021Independent Learning in Stochastic Gamescited by 20
  10. 2022Independent and Decentralized Learning in Markov Potential Gamescited by 19
  11. 2019Policy-Gradient Algorithms Have No Guarantees of Convergence in Linear Quadratic Gamescited by 15
  12. 2019Decentralized Learning for Optimality in Stochastic Dynamic Teams and Games with Local Control and Global State Informationcited by 12
2 more
  1. 2023Dealing With Non-stationarity in Decentralized Cooperative Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning via Multi-Timescale Learningcited by 12
  2. 2021Satisficing Paths and Independent Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in Stochastic Gamescited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.

3 papers.