From Military to Healthcare: Adopting and Expanding Ethical Principles for Generative Artificial Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In 2020, the U.S. Department of Defense officially disclosed a set of ethical principles to guide the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies on future battlefields. Despite stark differences, there are core similarities between the military and medical service. Warriors on battlefields often face life-altering circumstances that require quick decision-making. Medical providers experience similar challenges in a rapidly changing healthcare environment, such as in the emergency department or during surgery treating a life-threatening condition. Generative AI, an emerging technology designed to efficiently generate valuable information, holds great promise. As computing power becomes more accessible and the abundance of health data, such as electronic health records, electrocardiograms, and medical images, increases, it is inevitable that healthcare will be revolutionized by this technology. Recently, generative AI has captivated the research community, leading to debates about its application in healthcare, mainly due to concerns about transparency and related issues. Meanwhile, concerns about the potential exacerbation of health disparities due to modeling biases have raised notable ethical concerns regarding the use of this technology in healthcare. However, the ethical principles for generative AI in healthcare have been understudied, and decision-makers often fail to consider the significance of generative AI. In this paper, we propose GREAT PLEA ethical principles, encompassing governance, reliability, equity, accountability, traceability, privacy, lawfulness, empathy, and autonomy, for generative AI in healthcare. We aim to proactively address the ethical dilemmas and challenges posed by the integration of generative AI in healthcare.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2023.
Builds on
32 of 105 references.
References · 32
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
- 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
- 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 888
- 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 760
- 2023Jailbreaking ChatGPT via Prompt Engineering: An Empirical Studycited by 478
20 more
- 2022Understanding Diffusion Models: A Unified Perspectivecited by 337
- 2023Text-to-image Diffusion Models in Generative AI: A Surveycited by 264
- 2022CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilitiescited by 245
- 2022GatorTron: A Large Clinical Language Model to Unlock Patient Information from Unstructured Electronic Health Recordscited by 238
- 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 206
- 2023A Study of Generative Large Language Model for Medical Research and Healthcarecited by 160
- 2023Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 144
- 2023A Complete Survey on Generative AI (AIGC): Is ChatGPT from GPT-4 to GPT-5 All You Need?cited by 84
- 2021Medically Aware GPT-3 as a Data Generator for Medical Dialogue Summarizationcited by 76
- 2023The Self-Perception and Political Biases of ChatGPTcited by 66
- 2023ChatGPT is a Knowledgeable but Inexperienced Solver: An Investigation of Commonsense Problem in Large Language Modelscited by 63
- 2017Metrics for Deep Generative Modelscited by 53
- 2022The Forgotten Margins of AI Ethicscited by 30
- 2021Generating Fake Cyber Threat Intelligence Using Transformer-Based Modelscited by 28
- 2023Differentiate ChatGPT-generated and Human-written Medical Textscited by 26
- 2023Are Chatbots Ready for Privacy-Sensitive Applications? An Investigation into Input Regurgitation and Prompt-Induced Sanitizationcited by 17
- 2022Towards Explainable Evaluation Metrics for Natural Language Generationcited by 15
- 2021Understanding Emails and Drafting Responses -- An Approach Using GPT-3cited by 10
- 2023Beyond Bias and Compliance: Towards Individual Agency and Plurality of Ethics in AIcited by 2
- 2022Bias Impact Analysis of AI in Consumer Mobile Health Technologies: Legal, Technical, and Policycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.