Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Companies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) like ChatGPT has swiftly entered organizations without adequate governance, posing both opportunities and risks. Limited research addresses organizational governance from both technical and business perspectives. This gap is particularly relevant for international businesses, where differences in regulation, language, and business environments complicate governance. While multiple frameworks for AI governance exist, this needed diversity is lacking for GenAI. This review paper fills this gap by surveying recent literature to better understand the fundamental characteristics of GenAI and to adapt existing governance frameworks specifically to GenAI. The resulting framework delineates scope, objectives, and governance mechanisms designed to both harness business opportunities and mitigate risks associated with GenAI integration. We theorize a distinctive property of GenAI governance: its scope is endogenous to use. Unlike conventional organizational AI, for which governance is organized around a fixed artifact (e.g., model, intended use), GenAI allows users to reconfigure the artifact (e.g., its behavior and risk). Consequently, the object of governance is not fixed ex ante but is partly constituted through use.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 135 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2024.
Builds on
39 of 135 references.
References · 39
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
27 more
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,055
- 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 894
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 763
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
- 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 619
- 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 434
- 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 365
- 2020Evaluation of Text Generation: A Surveycited by 277
- 2023Adapted Large Language Models Can Outperform Medical Experts in Clinical Text Summarizationcited by 246
- 2023Multilingual Jailbreak Challenges in Large Language Modelscited by 240
- 2022Language Models of Code are Few-Shot Commonsense Learnerscited by 160
- 2023Sociotechnical Safety Evaluation of Generative AI Systemscited by 157
- 2023From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacycited by 143
- 2023Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A Manifesto of Open Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research Directionscited by 125
- 2023Table Meets LLM: Can Large Language Models Understand Structured Table Data? A Benchmark and Empirical Studycited by 116
- 2023The Data Provenance Initiative: A Large Scale Audit of Dataset Licensing & Attribution in AIcited by 73
- 2023The Gradient of Generative AI Release: Methods and Considerationscited by 63
- 2022Investigating Explainability of Generative AI for Code through Scenario-based Designcited by 47
- 2020Behavioral Use Licensing for Responsible AIcited by 46
- 2022Data Governance in the Age of Large-Scale Data-Driven Language Technologycited by 33
- 2023Compress, Then Prompt: Improving Accuracy-Efficiency Trade-off of LLM Inference with Transferable Promptcited by 28
- 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citationscited by 11
- 2020Artificial Intelligence Governance for Businessescited by 8
- 2022Putting AI Ethics into Practice: The Hourglass Model of Organizational AI Governancecited by 7
- 2023How many preprints have actually been printed and why: a case study of computer science preprints on arXivcited by 6
- 2023From Military to Healthcare: Adopting and Expanding Ethical Principles for Generative Artificial Intelligencecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.