mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adapting to Change: Robust Counterfactual Explanations in Dynamic Data Landscapes

arXiv 2308.02353 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a novel semi-supervised Graph Counterfactual Explainer (GCE) methodology, Dynamic GRAph Counterfactual Explainer (DyGRACE). It leverages initial knowledge about the data distribution to search for valid counterfactuals while avoiding using information from potentially outdated decision functions in subsequent time steps. Employing two graph autoencoders (GAEs), DyGRACE learns the representation of each class in a binary classification scenario. The GAEs minimise the reconstruction error between the original graph and its learned representation during training. The method involves (i) optimising a parametric density function (implemented as a logistic regression function) to identify counterfactuals by maximising the factual autoencoder's reconstruction error, (ii) minimising the counterfactual autoencoder's error, and (iii) maximising the similarity between the factual and counterfactual graphs. This semi-supervised approach is independent of an underlying black-box oracle. A logistic regression model is trained on a set of graph pairs to learn weights that aid in finding counterfactuals. At inference, for each unseen graph, the logistic regressor identifies the best counterfactual candidate using these learned weights, while the GAEs can be iteratively updated to represent the continual adaptation of the learned graph representation over iterations. DyGRACE is quite effective and can act as a drift detector, identifying distributional drift based on differences in reconstruction errors between iterations. It avoids reliance on the oracle's predictions in successive iterations, thereby increasing the efficiency of counterfactual discovery. DyGRACE, with its capacity for contrastive learning and drift detection, will offer new avenues for semi-supervised learning and explanation generation.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2023.

Builds on

21 of 33 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,382
  2. 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 737
  3. 2020Explainability in Graph Neural Networks: A Taxonomic Surveycited by 384
  4. 2021CF-GNNExplainer: Counterfactual Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 119
  5. 2018Simplicial Closure and higher-order link predictioncited by 93
  6. 2022Learning and Evaluating Graph Neural Network Explanations based on Counterfactual and Factual Reasoningcited by 79
  7. 2021Robust Counterfactual Explanations on Graph Neural Networkscited by 72
  8. 2022CLEAR: Generative Counterfactual Explanations on Graphscited by 48
  9. 2017On the Reliable Detection of Concept Drift from Streaming Unlabeled Datacited by 33
  10. 2021Counterfactual Graphs for Explainable Classification of Brain Networkscited by 33
  11. 2021MEG: Generating Molecular Counterfactual Explanations for Deep Graph Networkscited by 32
  12. 2022Global Counterfactual Explainer for Graph Neural Networkscited by 30
9 more
  1. 2022A Survey on Graph Counterfactual Explanations: Definitions, Methods, Evaluation, and Research Challengescited by 30
  2. 2020Contrastive Graph Neural Network Explanationcited by 20
  3. 2022On the Trade-Off between Actionable Explanations and the Right to be Forgottencited by 20
  4. 2022CLARE: A Semi-supervised Community Detection Algorithmcited by 13
  5. 2020Learning Parameter Distributions to Detect Concept Drift in Data Streamscited by 12
  6. 2022On the Probability of Necessity and Sufficiency of Explaining Graph Neural Networks: A Lower Bound Optimization Approachcited by 11
  7. 2021Multi-objective Explanations of GNN Predictionscited by 10
  8. 2022GRETEL: A unified framework for Graph Counterfactual Explanation Evaluationcited by 6
  9. 2021Preserve, Promote, or Attack? GNN Explanation via Topology Perturbationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.