Continual Domain Adaptation on Aerial Images under Gradually Degrading Weather
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Domain adaptation (DA) strives to mitigate the domain gap between the source domain where a model is trained, and the target domain where the model is deployed. When a deep learning model is deployed on an aerial platform, it may face gradually degrading weather conditions during operation, leading to widening domain gaps between the training data and the encountered evaluation data. We synthesize two such gradually worsening weather conditions on real images from two existing aerial imagery datasets, generating a total of four benchmark datasets. Under the continual, or test-time adaptation setting, we evaluate three DA models on our datasets: a baseline standard DA model and two continual DA models. In such setting, the models can access only one small portion, or one batch of the target data at a time, and adaptation takes place continually, and over only one epoch of the data. The combination of the constraints of continual adaptation, and gradually deteriorating weather conditions provide the practical DA scenario for aerial deployment. Among the evaluated models, we consider both convolutional and transformer architectures for comparison. We discover stability issues during adaptation for existing buffer-fed continual DA methods, and offer gradient normalization as a simple solution to curb training instability.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2023.
Builds on
29 of 70 references.
References · 29
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
- 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,329
- 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,311
- 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,228
- 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,200
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
- 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
17 more
- 2020Prototypical Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Representationscited by 640
- 2016Deep Transfer Learning with Joint Adaptation Networkscited by 612
- 2014Deep Domain Confusion: Maximizing for Domain Invariancecited by 600
- 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 569
- 2016AID: A Benchmark Dataset for Performance Evaluation of Aerial Scene Classificationcited by 347
- 2019REMIND Your Neural Network to Prevent Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 197
- 2018Multi-Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 196
- 2017Central Moment Discrepancy (CMD) for Domain-Invariant Representation Learningcited by 192
- 2021Generalized Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 175
- 2020Understanding Self-Training for Gradual Domain Adaptationcited by 149
- 2019Transferrable Prototypical Networks for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 141
- 2020Unsupervised Domain Adaptation via Structurally Regularized Deep Clusteringcited by 140
- 2022Source-Free Domain Adaptation via Distribution Estimationcited by 97
- 2016A Survey on Object Detection in Optical Remote Sensing Imagescited by 78
- 2017Learning Aerial Image Segmentation from Online Mapscited by 30
- 2019Deep-Learning-Based Aerial Image Classification for Emergency Response Applications Using Unmanned Aerial Vehiclescited by 25
- 2020Satellite Image Classification with Deep Learningcited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.