mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-Supervised Contrastive BERT Fine-tuning for Fusion-based Reviewed-Item Retrieval

arXiv 2308.00762 ↗First posted 1 Aug 2023cs.IR cs.CL cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As natural language interfaces enable users to express increasingly complex natural language queries, there is a parallel explosion of user review content that can allow users to better find items such as restaurants, books, or movies that match these expressive queries. While Neural Information Retrieval (IR) methods have provided state-of-the-art results for matching queries to documents, they have not been extended to the task of Reviewed-Item Retrieval (RIR), where query-review scores must be aggregated (or fused) into item-level scores for ranking. In the absence of labeled RIR datasets, we extend Neural IR methodology to RIR by leveraging self-supervised methods for contrastive learning of BERT embeddings for both queries and reviews. Specifically, contrastive learning requires a choice of positive and negative samples, where the unique two-level structure of our item-review data combined with meta-data affords us a rich structure for the selection of these samples. For contrastive learning in a Late Fusion scenario, we investigate the use of positive review samples from the same item and/or with the same rating, selection of hard positive samples by choosing the least similar reviews from the same anchor item, and selection of hard negative samples by choosing the most similar reviews from different items. We also explore anchor sub-sampling and augmenting with meta-data. For a more end-to-end Early Fusion approach, we introduce contrastive item embedding learning to fuse reviews into single item embeddings. Experimental results show that Late Fusion contrastive learning for Neural RIR outperforms all other contrastive IR configurations, Neural IR, and sparse retrieval baselines, thus demonstrating the power of exploiting the two-level structure in Neural RIR approaches as well as the importance of preserving the nuance of individual review content via Late Fusion methods.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2023.

Builds on

14 of 31 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  4. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
  5. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
  6. 2019Passage Re-ranking with BERTcited by 629
  7. 2020Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyondcited by 266
  8. 2017Efficient Natural Language Response Suggestion for Smart Replycited by 228
  9. 2021Unsupervised Corpus Aware Language Model Pre-training for Dense Passage Retrievalcited by 203
  10. 2021Condenser: a Pre-training Architecture for Dense Retrievalcited by 162
  11. 2019Learning Dense Representations for Entity Retrievalcited by 122
  12. 2021On Interpretation and Measurement of Soft Attributes for Recommendationcited by 19
2 more
  1. 2017Design Patterns for Fusion-Based Object Retrievalcited by 3
  2. 2021"It doesn't look good for a date": Transforming Critiques into Preferences for Conversational Recommendation Systemscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 1.

6 papers.