"It doesn't look good for a date": Transforming Critiques into Preferences for Conversational Recommendation Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conversations aimed at determining good recommendations are iterative in nature. People often express their preferences in terms of a critique of the current recommendation (e.g., "It doesn't look good for a date"), requiring some degree of common sense for a preference to be inferred. In this work, we present a method for transforming a user critique into a positive preference (e.g., "I prefer more romantic") in order to retrieve reviews pertaining to potentially better recommendations (e.g., "Perfect for a romantic dinner"). We leverage a large neural language model (LM) in a few-shot setting to perform critique-to-preference transformation, and we test two methods for retrieving recommendations: one that matches embeddings, and another that fine-tunes an LM for the task. We instantiate this approach in the restaurant domain and evaluate it using a new dataset of restaurant critiques. In an ablation study, we show that utilizing critique-to-preference transformation improves recommendations, and that there are at least three general cases that explain this improved performance.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2021.
Builds on
13 of 21 references.
References · 13
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2018MultiWOZ -- A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz Dataset for Task-Oriented Dialogue Modellingcited by 760
- 2019Commonsense Knowledge Mining from Pretrained Modelscited by 189
- 2019Taskmaster-1: Toward a Realistic and Diverse Dialog Datasetcited by 139
- 2018Conversational Recommender Systemcited by 115
- 2020Like hiking? You probably enjoy nature: Persona-grounded Dialog with Commonsense Expansionscited by 49
- 2020Learning-to-Rank with BERT in TF-Rankingcited by 36
- 2020What does BERT know about books, movies and music? Probing BERT for Conversational Recommendationcited by 36
- 2020"I'd rather just go to bed": Understanding Indirect Answerscited by 36
- 2018TF-Ranking: Scalable TensorFlow Library for Learning-to-Rankcited by 32
- 2021"I'm Not Mad": Commonsense Implications of Negation and Contradictioncited by 26
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2.
3 papers.
- 2022Learning to Perform Complex Tasks through Compositional Fine-Tuning of Language Modelscited by 10
- 2023Self-Supervised Contrastive BERT Fine-tuning for Fusion-based Reviewed-Item Retrievalcited by 6
- 2023A Conversation is Worth A Thousand Recommendations: A Survey of Holistic Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 3
- 2023A Conversation is Worth A Thousand Recommendations: A Survey of Holistic Conversational Recommender Systems14 Sep 2023
- 2023Self-Supervised Contrastive BERT Fine-tuning for Fusion-based Reviewed-Item Retrieval1 Aug 2023
- 2022Learning to Perform Complex Tasks through Compositional Fine-Tuning of Language Models23 Oct 2022
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Large Language Models are Competitive Near Cold-start Recommenders for Language- and Item-based Preferences
- 2023Rethinking the Evaluation for Conversational Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Models
- 2025A Framework for Generating Conversational Recommendation Datasets from Behavioral Interactions
- 2026When and How to Ask: Dynamic Preference Elicitation Strategies for Conversational Recommendation ↗
- 2024Bayesian Optimization with LLM-Based Acquisition Functions for Natural Language Preference Elicitation
- 2025Evaluating Conversational Recommender Systems via Large Language Models: A User-Centric Framework
- 2025Graph Retrieval-Augmented LLM for Conversational Recommendation Systems
- 2026Toward User Preference Alignment in LLM Recommendation via Explicit Context Feedback