Doubly Robust Instance-Reweighted Adversarial Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Assigning importance weights to adversarial data has achieved great success in training adversarially robust networks under limited model capacity. However, existing instance-reweighted adversarial training (AT) methods heavily depend on heuristics and/or geometric interpretations to determine those importance weights, making these algorithms lack rigorous theoretical justification/guarantee. Moreover, recent research has shown that adversarial training suffers from a severe non-uniform robust performance across the training distribution, e.g., data points belonging to some classes can be much more vulnerable to adversarial attacks than others. To address both issues, in this paper, we propose a novel doubly-robust instance reweighted AT framework, which allows to obtain the importance weights via exploring distributionally robust optimization (DRO) techniques, and at the same time boosts the robustness on the most vulnerable examples. In particular, our importance weights are obtained by optimizing the KL-divergence regularized loss function, which allows us to devise new algorithms with a theoretical convergence guarantee. Experiments on standard classification datasets demonstrate that our proposed approach outperforms related state-of-the-art baseline methods in terms of average robust performance, and at the same time improves the robustness against attacks on the weakest data points. Codes will be available soon.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2023.
Builds on
62 of 77 references.
References · 62
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,782
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
38 more
- 2019Meta-Learning with Implicit Gradientscited by 523
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
- 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
- 2018Bilevel Programming for Hyperparameter Optimization and Meta-Learningcited by 403
- 2018Meta-learning with differentiable closed-form solverscited by 395
- 2015Gradient-based Hyperparameter Optimization through Reversible Learningcited by 357
- 2019Optimizing Millions of Hyperparameters by Implicit Differentiationcited by 303
- 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
- 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 233
- 2017Forward and Reverse Gradient-Based Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 232
- 2016Hyperparameter optimization with approximate gradientcited by 231
- 2020Bilevel Optimization: Convergence Analysis and Enhanced Designcited by 219
- 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
- 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
- 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 193
- 2018Truncated Back-propagation for Bilevel Optimizationcited by 187
- 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 174
- 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 171
- 2017The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examplescited by 156
- 2020On the Iteration Complexity of Hypergradient Computationcited by 154
- 2021Investigating Bi-Level Optimization for Learning and Vision from a Unified Perspective: A Survey and Beyondcited by 151
- 2016On Differentiating Parameterized Argmin and Argmax Problems with Application to Bi-level Optimizationcited by 108
- 2014Stochastic Compositional Gradient Descent: Algorithms for Minimizing Compositions of Expected-Value Functionscited by 93
- 2020A Generic First-Order Algorithmic Framework for Bi-Level Programming Beyond Lower-Level Singletoncited by 78
- 2021Revisiting and Advancing Fast Adversarial Training Through The Lens of Bi-Level Optimizationcited by 75
- 2018Reviving and Improving Recurrent Back-Propagationcited by 69
- 2020Convergence of Meta-Learning with Task-Specific Adaptation over Partial Parameterscited by 65
- 2021Towards Gradient-based Bilevel Optimization with Non-convex Followers and Beyondcited by 62
- 2021Probabilistic Margins for Instance Reweighting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 57
- 2020Solving Stochastic Compositional Optimization is Nearly as Easy as Solving Stochastic Optimizationcited by 51
- 2021iDARTS: Differentiable Architecture Search with Stochastic Implicit Gradientscited by 51
- 2021Adversarial Robustness under Long-Tailed Distributioncited by 50
- 2016Accelerating Stochastic Composition Optimizationcited by 46
- 2021Lower Bounds and Accelerated Algorithms for Bilevel Optimizationcited by 46
- 2020An Online Method for A Class of Distributionally Robust Optimization with Non-Convex Objectivescited by 42
- 2021CausalAdv: Adversarial Robustness through the Lens of Causalitycited by 37
- 2018Robust Optimization over Multiple Domainscited by 34
- 2021Analysis and Applications of Class-wise Robustness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 33
50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.