Large Language Models for Education: Grading Open-Ended Questions Using ChatGPT
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As a way of addressing increasingly sophisticated problems, software professionals face the constant challenge of seeking improvement. However, for these individuals to enhance their skills, their process of studying and training must involve feedback that is both immediate and accurate. In the context of software companies, where the scale of professionals undergoing training is large, but the number of qualified professionals available for providing corrections is small, delivering effective feedback becomes even more challenging. To circumvent this challenge, this work presents an exploration of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to support the correction process of open-ended questions in technical training. In this study, we utilized ChatGPT to correct open-ended questions answered by 42 industry professionals on two topics. Evaluating the corrections and feedback provided by ChatGPT, we observed that it is capable of identifying semantic details in responses that other metrics cannot observe. Furthermore, we noticed that, in general, subject matter experts tended to agree with the corrections and feedback given by ChatGPT.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2024Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlookcited by 188
- 2024Can AI grade your essays? A comparative analysis of large language models and teacher ratings in multidimensional essay scoringcited by 20
- 2025A Novel Approach to Scalable and Automatic Topic-Controlled Question Generation in Educationcited by 11
- 2024Subtle Biases Need Subtler Measures: Dual Metrics for Evaluating Representative and Affinity Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2024Grading Massive Open Online Courses Using Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025CoTAL: Human-in-the-Loop Prompt Engineering for Generalizable Formative Assessment Scoring and Feedbackcited by 5
- 2024Revolutionising Distance Learning: A Comparative Study of Learning Progress with AI-Driven Tutoringcited by 3
- 2024Large Language Models As MOOCs Graderscited by 2
- 2025From Motion Signals to Insights: A Unified Framework for Student Behavior Analysis and Feedback in Physical Education Classescited by 1
- 2025A Comparison of Conversational Models and Humans in Answering Technical Questions: the Firefox Casecited by 0
- 2026Humanizing AI Grading: Student-Centered Insights on Fairness, Trust, Consistency and Transparencycited by 0
- 2026Humanizing AI Grading: Student-Centered Insights on Fairness, Trust, Consistency and Transparency8 Feb 2026
- 2025A Comparison of Conversational Models and Humans in Answering Technical Questions: the Firefox Case24 Oct 2025
- 2025CoTAL: Human-in-the-Loop Prompt Engineering for Generalizable Formative Assessment Scoring and Feedback3 Apr 2025
- 2025From Motion Signals to Insights: A Unified Framework for Student Behavior Analysis and Feedback in Physical Education Classes9 Mar 2025
- 2025A Novel Approach to Scalable and Automatic Topic-Controlled Question Generation in Education9 Jan 2025
- 2024Can AI grade your essays? A comparative analysis of large language models and teacher ratings in multidimensional essay scoring25 Nov 2024
- 2024Grading Massive Open Online Courses Using Large Language Models16 Jun 2024
- 2024Subtle Biases Need Subtler Measures: Dual Metrics for Evaluating Representative and Affinity Bias in Large Language Models23 May 2024
- 2024Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlook26 Mar 2024
- 2024Revolutionising Distance Learning: A Comparative Study of Learning Progress with AI-Driven Tutoring21 Feb 2024
- 2024Large Language Models As MOOCs Graders6 Feb 2024