mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Subtle Biases Need Subtler Measures: Dual Metrics for Evaluating Representative and Affinity Bias in Large Language Models

arXiv 2405.14555 ↗First posted 23 May 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Research on Large Language Models (LLMs) has often neglected subtle biases that, although less apparent, can significantly influence the models' outputs toward particular social narratives. This study addresses two such biases within LLMs: representative bias, which denotes a tendency of LLMs to generate outputs that mirror the experiences of certain identity groups, and affinity bias, reflecting the models' evaluative preferences for specific narratives or viewpoints. We introduce two novel metrics to measure these biases: the Representative Bias Score (RBS) and the Affinity Bias Score (ABS), and present the Creativity-Oriented Generation Suite (CoGS), a collection of open-ended tasks such as short story writing and poetry composition, designed with customized rubrics to detect these subtle biases. Our analysis uncovers marked representative biases in prominent LLMs, with a preference for identities associated with being white, straight, and men. Furthermore, our investigation of affinity bias reveals distinctive evaluative patterns within each model, akin to `bias fingerprints'. This trend is also seen in human evaluators, highlighting a complex interplay between human and machine bias perceptions.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2024.

Builds on

22 of 42 references.

References · 22

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,072
  2. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,317
  3. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,054
  4. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 797
  5. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 731
  6. 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
  7. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 416
  8. 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 411
  9. 2023From Pretraining Data to Language Models to Downstream Tasks: Tracking the Trails of Political Biases Leading to Unfair NLP Modelscited by 260
  10. 2023"Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letterscited by 198
  11. 2021Large Pre-trained Language Models Contain Human-like Biases of What is Right and Wrong to Docited by 178
  12. 2023Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey designcited by 177
10 more
  1. 2023Art or Artifice? Large Language Models and the False Promise of Creativitycited by 168
  2. 2021Bias Out-of-the-Box: An Empirical Analysis of Intersectional Occupational Biases in Popular Generative Language Modelscited by 141
  3. 2022Creative Writing with an AI-Powered Writing Assistant: Perspectives from Professional Writerscited by 69
  4. 2023ROBBIE: Robust Bias Evaluation of Large Generative Language Modelscited by 53
  5. 2023Sociodemographic Prompting is Not Yet an Effective Approach for Simulating Subjective Judgments with LLMscited by 36
  6. 2023Bounding the Capabilities of Large Language Models in Open Text Generation with Prompt Constraintscited by 31
  7. 2023Evaluating Biased Attitude Associations of Language Models in an Intersectional Contextcited by 20
  8. 2023Bits of Grass: Does GPT already know how to write like Whitman?cited by 13
  9. 2023Large Language Models for Education: Grading Open-Ended Questions Using ChatGPTcited by 11
  10. 2023Most Language Models can be Poets too: An AI Writing Assistant and Constrained Text Generation Studiocited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

10 papers.