mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-growth stage plant recognition: a case study of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

arXiv 2307.15816 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many advanced, image-based precision agricultural technologies for plant breeding, field crop research, and site-specific crop management hinge on the reliable detection and phenotyping of plants across highly variable morphological growth stages. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown promise for image-based plant phenotyping and weed recognition, but their ability to recognize growth stages, often with stark differences in appearance, is uncertain. Amaranthus palmeri (Palmer amaranth) is a particularly challenging weed plant in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) production, exhibiting highly variable plant morphology both across growth stages over a growing season, as well as between plants at a given growth stage due to high genetic diversity. In this paper, we investigate eight-class growth stage recognition of A. palmeri in cotton as a challenging model for You Only Look Once (YOLO) architectures. We compare 26 different architecture variants from YOLO v3, v5, v6, v6 3.0, v7, and v8 on an eight-class growth stage dataset of A. palmeri. The highest mAP@[0.5:0.95] for recognition of all growth stage classes was 47.34% achieved by v8-X, with inter-class confusion across visually similar growth stages. With all growth stages grouped as a single class, performance increased, with a maximum mean average precision (mAP@[0.5:0.95]) of 67.05% achieved by v7-Original. Single class recall of up to 81.42% was achieved by v5-X, and precision of up to 89.72% was achieved by v8-X. Class activation maps (CAM) were used to understand model attention on the complex dataset. Fewer classes, grouped by visual or size features improved performance over the ground-truth eight-class dataset. Successful growth stage detection highlights the substantial opportunity for improving plant phenotyping and weed recognition technologies with open-source object detection architectures.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2023.

Builds on

12 of 52 references.

References · 12

  1. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  2. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  3. 2022YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectorscited by 978
  4. 2022YOLOv6: A Single-Stage Object Detection Framework for Industrial Applicationscited by 273
  5. 2017Perceptual Generative Adversarial Networks for Small Object Detectioncited by 76
  6. 2018DeepWeeds: A Multiclass Weed Species Image Dataset for Deep Learningcited by 69
  7. 2023YOLOv6 v3.0: A Full-Scale Reloadingcited by 58
  8. 2020Global Wheat Head Detection (GWHD) dataset: a large and diverse dataset of high resolution RGB labelled images to develop and benchmark wheat head detection methodscited by 42
  9. 2021A Survey of Deep Learning Techniques for Weed Detection from Imagescited by 23
  10. 2021Performance Evaluation of Deep Transfer Learning on Multiclass Identification of Common Weed Species in Cotton Production Systemscited by 15
  11. 2021WheatNet: A Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network for High-throughput Image-based Wheat Head Detection and Countingcited by 8
  12. 2021Towards practical object detection for weed spraying in precision agriculturecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.